Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether cell phones should be banned in public places has always been at the center of discussions. Some people welcome cell phones, arguing that phones are quite an aid for them while others are concerned the rings and buzzes of phones leave those public places unbearable. From my perspective, cell phones should be allowed in public sites.
Firstly, mobile phones have become part of people’s lives which are too integrated to decouple them from people even in public places. Mobile phones nowadays function quite crucially in every aspect of people’s lives. They work as a connection between people and their jobs, friends, and families. If people are denied the freedom to use their phones in such public places as museums, libraries, or the like, they might miss some important information. Information is important. Examples abound, including a businessman always having to be in tune with market changes, and Missing out on a piece of information might cost him a chance to promote a deal that ends up quite a fortune. Therefore, it is not feasible to require people to divorce from their phones even in public places.
Secondly, mobile phones could be set to be mute to keep quietness in public places. Understandably, some people have concerns that a phone disrupts the great atmosphere of a public place. For example, the sudden rings or buzzes of a phone ruin a mood to appreciate a film in a theatre or the attention to crack a math problem in a library. However, a cure for what afflicts those people is not to ban cellphones. Instead, concerns can be easily solved by public places setting strict rules. Rules include every electronic device should be muted or a talk on the phone should be conducted in certain regions of a public place. When a cellphone is muted, it is still functioning. Therefore people could still feel connected to the world and would not miss any information.
In conclusion, it is not practical to prohibit cell phones in all public places. Some strategies can be applied to mitigate people’s concern about the inconvenience that cell phones might cause to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-23 | WXY8888 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | WXY8888 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | WXY8888 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-20 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | husan shergill | 89 | view |
- Many children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies at school What are the causes What are the possible solutions to this problem 70
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Air travel only benefits the richest people and the majority of people take no advantage from the development of airplanes To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether cell phones should be banned in public ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hone is muted, it is still functioning. Therefore people could still feel connected to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9661971831 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69081770115 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52676056338 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4865861184 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.15 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375466918376 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126990901384 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837296623468 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248639253912 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656709814338 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.