The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given process illustrates the advancement of the cutting tools in the Stone Age.
As can bee seen from the diagram, there are various transformations that the equipment underwent during the period of 1.4 million years ago and 0.8 million years ago. It is also evident that the tool had been enlarged in terms of width and height.
Concerning the front view, 0.8 million years ago, it had a raindrop-like shape, which had been evolved from the snuggling shape. The most significant shift was the sharp tip of the tools, which was the lack of that 1.4 million years ago.
Anologously, both side view and back view of the equipment had also been through changes. While the side view had been flattened, the back view displayed a remarkable growth in height and width that resulted in a more suitable shape to grab.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | imurminhanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | xuanhieu26 | 61 | view |
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 43
- In many countries the costs of living are rising What are the effects on individuals and society Suggest solutions to this problem 61
- The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe
- Topic The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 142 200
No. of Characters: 657 1000
No. of Different Words: 77 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.452 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.627 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.502 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 34 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 29 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.229 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.471 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.471 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.107 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4
The illustration provides information about the evolution of stone cutting tools in the Stone Age, which was used by prehistoric men.
In general, the cutting tool had dramatically altered, which became larger during millions of years. Moreover, tool B was more refined than tool A at the shape and sharpness by the craftsmanship of prehistoric men.
According to the graph, 1.4 million years ago, tool A was approximately 10 cm with uneven angles, especially the front view of it, while the back view witnessed a completely different glance. The side view was cut roughly and obtusely.
However, 600000 years later, the cutting tool was advanced significantly from every aspect. It can clearly be seen that tool B was grinded more carefully and witnessed a definite tear-drop shape from the front view. The back and side views were tapered aggressively in order to become a sharper tool. Furthermore, the size was much bigger from both horizontal and vertical axises.