Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Some people believe that new medicines and treatments can replace visiting a doctor. I personally argue that this is a wrong view and may cause negative consequences in the future.
Medicines and any new treatment methods that are not certified legally can cause severe impacts on users. When people have some health problems, they tend to try the quickest method to treat these issues, sometimes it is very dangerous to apply this drugs because there is no evidence about the effectiveness of it and related side effects. For example, headache and flu have some similar symptoms but if someone does not visit a doctor, and try some drugs at home, it is likely to misunderstand.
Furthermore, patients often are not ensured when they try alternative medicines and treatments. It is clear that when people try to cure themselfe, they have to accept all related problems. While we always have documents from doctors or medical staff to any illness that we have, trying alternative ones at home will not be guaranteed legally. Besides, these methods are applied based on trust and belief so it is difficult to deal with when a person has related problems. We have no right to require benefits for ourselve.
In conclusion, people with health problems who are trying instead methods rather than visiting their usual doctor may have a lot of problems related to their health, their rights when these methods turn out uneffective and bring severe consequences. It seems to me that this is a negative development that people should not try.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
... misunderstand. Furthermore, patients often are not ensured when they try alternative m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...development that people should not try.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98832684825 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65128203544 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9200847665 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.833333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289128557227 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103503495371 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782582795707 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195158271674 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974119283373 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
... misunderstand. Furthermore, patients often are not ensured when they try alternative m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...development that people should not try.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98832684825 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65128203544 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9200847665 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.833333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289128557227 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103503495371 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782582795707 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195158271674 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974119283373 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.