The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the average of five different household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in 2010
Overall, while food and other spending categories expenses saw minor variation between Japan and Malaysia, housing, differed markedly. Meanwhile, the figure for spending on transport and healthcare in Japan were doubled those in Malaysia.
Regarding Malaysia, in 2010, the expenses on housing were the highest, accounting for roughly 34% of the total. In Japan, there had been slight change this outlay, at 21%; ranked after the spending on other goods and services and food, settling at 29% and 24% respectively. Moreover, two expenditures in Malaysia had similarity, at nearly 26%.
Turning to other household budget distribution, Japanese spending on transport and healthcare doubled that of Malaysia. Specifically, the spending on transport and healthcare almost tripled in Japan, at 20% and 6% in that order. On the contrary, the budget for healthcare in Malaysia hit the lowest point at only 3%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
2022-07-19 | Taytor2609 | 84 | view |
2022-07-19 | Taytor2609 | 100 | view |
2020-12-20 | vungochuyen25 | 78 | view |
- Cinema attendance by age group 84
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that schools should teach enroll students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities skills studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Cinema attendance by age group 84
- The bar chart shows the difference between boys and girls in the selection of subjects at higher education levels in Canada in the year 2009 67
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 156 200
No. of Characters: 813 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.534 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.212 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.824 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.194 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.48 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.48 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4