The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people.
The bar chart illustrates housing preferences among people who lived in the British cities of Liverpool, London and Manchester in the year 2009.
It is clear that Living in flats was the most popular choice among Liverpool residents, while people living in London and Manchester had a tendency towards Semi-detached houses. In contrast, the lowest figure belonged to Terraced Houses in all cities.
Nearly 60% of respondents to the survey in Liverpool preferred apartments, nearly tripling that of Manchester, with about 20%. However, the opposite tendency could be seen in the figures for detached houses and semi-detached houses, accounting for around 16% and well over 30% of the preferences expressed in each option in Liverpool and Manchester respectively. In contrast, there were just roundly 10% of residents in both cities choosing Terraced houses in 2009.
Regarding the survey result in London, well over a third of the preferences went on Semi- detached houses. This was followed by nearly 30% and 25% of citizens choosing Apartments and Detached houses respectively. On the contrary, the figure for terraced houses was lower, with slightly less than 20% of survey participants selecting them.
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 78
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, third, well, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39153439153 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88907300225 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5170569033 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222443189789 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965268150937 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661982436118 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151312098016 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773718651387 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.