The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009. Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrate the percentages of voyagers who use distintive means on transport in a particular nation between 1989 to 2009.
Overall, an upward trend is recorded in both rail and coach’s transportation rate. On the other hand, air travel witnessed a downgrade in usage rate. With car and ferry, their popularity as means of transport during this recorded time span from 1989 to 2009 fluctuated.
Recorded in 1989, barely any travelers to that specific country didn’t bat an eyelid for ferry as a mean of transport with an usage rate below 5%. In the mean time, Tourist’s interest with coach is below 10%, approximately 9%. However, we see that railway’s transportation alongside with air transportation both have 34% and 38% at tourist’s usage rate respectively. The highest type of transportation in 1989 in that country is car with an estimated usage rate at 50%.
After 1989, ferry as a transportation reached its peak with 12% of tourists using it before falling down to its usage rate in 1999 in 2009, being 8%. Coach’s usage rate, however, rose from 9% to 26%. Unlike coach’s usage rate, which had an upward trend, air transportation’s rate of utilization decreased from 38% to 22% in 2009, being its lowest in the past years. Whereas air transportation had a downward trend, the percentages of voyagers that uses rail transportation grow, gradually reach almost 60% of use rate. Car’s usage rate as transportation for travelers to that respective country, however, fluctuated as it eventually take 52% rate of utilization for travelling for tourists in 2009.
To summarise, both rail and coach had an upward trend, air transportation had a downward trend while car and ferry’s usage rate fluctuated.
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of our increasing use of computers 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is not realistic for people to expect to work at the same company or employer all of their life 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d for ferry as a mean of transport with an usage rate below 5%. In the mean time, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14351241504 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489436619718 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4429075755 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243794634419 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108800600053 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829308714733 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168265417808 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103632269166 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d for ferry as a mean of transport with an usage rate below 5%. In the mean time, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14351241504 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489436619718 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4429075755 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243794634419 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108800600053 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829308714733 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168265417808 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103632269166 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.