There is an ongoing debate over the necessity of spending money whether on building new railways for high-speed trains to connect the cities or on developing public transportation that already exists. Although constructing new infrastructures for trains is a huge economic advancement, I believe that the government should put improving public transport on top priority.
In terms of making railway lines for fast trains, several advantages can be brought about. Firstly, with the construction of new lines for very fast ,trains people will have the opportunity to go to other cities for different purposes in a shorter time with lower prices than flights. Moreover, it is a safer way to travel within a country rather than taking a car trip, for example. Secondly, these facilities can lead to economic boosts in different spots. For instance, more people are able to visit a place. As a result, more investments and more funds will flow to that region.
On the other hand, the improvement of public means of transportation has many upsides for residents. Through these ,developments people will be enabled to go to their workplace easier without any delay. In other words, they can go to work on time with no stress. Furthermore, this way of transportation also helps people with low income and those who do not have access to cars to go wherever they need. Thus, they will have more chances of finding a job or visiting new places in their town.
In conclusion, spending money on building new railways for high-speed trains has many benefits, though I am of the opinion that the government should spend its funds on enhancing public transportation in advance.
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants measured in million tonnes from three different sources between 1990 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- he table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district 78
- the graph below illustrates internet users as percentage of population in the countries usa canada and mexico between 1999 to 2009 67
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport Discuss both the 67
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food Other people believe that education will not work Discuss both opi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... construction of new lines for very fast ,trains people will have the opportunity ...
^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...any upsides for residents. Through these ,developments people will be enabled to g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05797101449 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89673856396 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8078921127 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349981359443 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107190712161 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938012195664 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224654286797 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834281392871 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.