The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the levels of manufacturing primary fuels in a nation within Europe between 1981 and 2000.
Overall, the production levels of the petroleum and natural gas increased, while that of the coal decreased. It is also noticeable that the petroleum was the fuel which was produced the most during the provided period of time.
In the beginning year 1981, the petroleum started with 100 tons, as the highest production level. It grew in the next two years and leveled out until 1987. After that time, the petroleum witnessed a decreased to the same figure at the start in 1989, and still fell slightly to under 100 tons until 1992. The coal began in the second position at 80 tons, and remained unchanged until 1984. Then it dropped to under 60 tons in 1985 and rose to around 70 tons in 1987. After that time, it began to decreased gradually until 1992. The natural gas started with half of the coal in the beginning, and stayed unchanged until 1992.
Within the remaining period of time, the petroleum saw an increase to around 140 tons in 1996, and fluctuated around 120 tons until the final year, maintaining the dominant position. The coal kept on dropping steadily to under 40 tons in the end, being in the lowest position. The natural gas remained unchanged until 1994, then experienced an upward trend to over 80 tons in the end, as the second place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 80
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
- Modern technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 80
- The table below shows the population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s produced the most during the provided period of time. In the beginning year 1981, the petro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...anged until 1992. Within the remaining period of time, the petroleum saw an increase to aroun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71604938272 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39735864858 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497942386831 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5103975739 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1538461538 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0674851826675 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307851427536 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491409427849 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649504008757 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596392075765 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.