The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
Write at least 150 words.
The following charts illustrate how Singapore's education system varied from 2000 to 2010. They show how long people typically went to school and what their highest level of education was.
Overall, numbers of spent years at school are growing at this period for males. Meanwhile, these numbers of years don’t have a noticeable change at the same period. Additionally, the university qualifications ratio of adults has increased clearly and significantly, while the percentage of high school qualifications has decreased significantly.
In regards to average number of years spent at school, Males used to spend almost 9 years in the beginning of the new Millennium, but in 2010 they spend almost 12 years. However, females have less marked trend. As they spent almost 8 years at school in 2000 then, changed this average to less than 9 years through ten years.
In regards to education level, data reveals that the ratio of university qualifications for adults has increased 4 times. Moreover, the percentage of primary school qualification has decreased significantly through these years, it is observed that ratio has fallen to less than one eighth. conversely, charts demonstrate that master qualification ratio of adults has increased significantly almost 4 times.
- The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 89
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 78
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What s your opinion
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a honey bee 67
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views an 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...fications has decreased significantly. In regards to average number of years spent at school...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...o less than 9 years through ten years. In regards to education level, data reveals that the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
...tio has fallen to less than one eighth. conversely, charts demonstrate that master qualifi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40201005025 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03619903551 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1672661426 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7272727273 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222575612662 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916321183018 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892383538125 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148932154329 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115754873275 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.