The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
Write at least 150 words.
The two charts represent the average levels of participated students in education as well as the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, throughout the years spent in schools, it is shown that the number of adult male’s participation was above the number of adult female’s participation in education. In addition, while the highest level of education among university qualifications and master qualifications had the highest share.
In regards to the amount of participated students in education, it is obvious that male adults are the ones who participated more than females. In 2010, the number of males exceeded the number of females in contrary to year 2000 where it shows a slight difference in the number of participation according to females and males.
Regarding their level of education, there is a major difference in the level of education from year 2000 to 2010.There is a sharply increase in the percentage requiring university qualifications and master qualifications in 2010. Just over half of the students applied for both university and master qualifications in 2010 compared to 2000 that represented less than a fifth of the level of education among students.
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore
- The graphs above compare the percentage of hiring rate and average earning dollar per week according to education degree achieved in 2008 Overall the trend seems to be opposite for each of graphs As the employment level for higher degrees seems to have hi
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below provides information about three different types of music in England 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two charts represent the average lev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
... qualifications had the highest share. In regards to the amount of participated students in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nes who participated more than females. In 2010, the number of males exceeded the ...
^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...vel of education from year 2000 to 2010.There is a sharply increase in the percentage...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ucation from year 2000 to 2010.There is a sharply increase in the percentage requiring university ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the level of education among students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30412371134 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21529269764 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.9134806823 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400946578713 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208456156009 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160376939673 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291543254173 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171441535025 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.