Some people think that it is worth researching different minerals in space. Others, however, disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Due to the technological advancement, it is possible now to conduct the search for natural resources outside the Earth. While some concur that such ventures are critical for mitigating the political conflicts for resource scarcity on Earth, I find that this approach is not sustainable, and therefore is a waste of resources.
On the one hand, it is logical why some people deem resource exploitation on other planets worthwhile since it can temporarily ease the energy crisis on Earth. Due to the problems of overpopulation and consumerism, the earth is now experiencing a gradual depletion of natural substances such as coal and oil. Minerals like these are important in generating energy for human activities and the scarcity of such resources has already given rise to political tension between many countries, leading to conflicts and even wars. If fuels in space are to be discovered and utilized, these new energy sources can help meet the global demand and ease the strain between nations.
On the other hand, despite the above undisputed benefits of this endeavor, many people believe that it is not sustainable and I am of the same opinion. These minerals, be it from celestial bodies or not, are subject to an inevitable exhaustion. Therefore, this approach only offers humanity a temporary reprieve, potentially delaying necessary long-term actions needed to address the core issues of consumerism and the necessity for sustainable practices. Additionally, the plan to extract minerals from outer space will demand astronomical expenditures to be realized, and even with all that investment, its success is not guaranteed due to human technical challenges. Therefore, it would be much wiser to redirect these funds on Earth to research renewable energies and implement their use on a global scale.
In conclusion, some people might support the extraction of minerals from other planets, but personally, I hold the opposing view on the matter as it does not bring long-term benefits and, therefore, resources for this plan should otherwise go into researching renewable energies.
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 85
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 56
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...nflicts for resource scarcity on Earth, I find that this approach is not sustaina...
^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... believe that it is not sustainable and I am of the same opinion. These minerals,...
^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...als from other planets, but personally, I hold the opposing view on the matter as...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36858006042 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00179602624 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570996978852 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5899855482 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.083333333 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122173427397 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425039434805 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462245379517 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787919406548 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459242807314 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.