The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of the population of society in three distinct groups in Italy and Yemen in 2000 and prediction for 2050.
It is obvious that the majority of percent related to 15-59 years people in Yemen in 2050 and Italy in 2000. Elderly persons rate are very low in Yemen for both 2000 and 2050 years, while this rate in Italy has increased more than double.
As can be seen, Yemen was a young country because more than half percent of people who lived in there were between 0 and 14 years old, the second group (15-59 years) has above three quarter percent, and the last group include elderly people who have 60+ years just have 3.6% in 2000. By 2050 all groups increased except young group people that will decline around 15%. In contrast, Italy has different situation that the society has 61.6% adult, nearly 25% elderly and just less than a quarter young group in 2000. Unfurtunately, the propotion of elderly will rise to 42.3% and other remin group will decrease in 2050.
As a result, Although Yemen will have very good situation in 2050, Italy should set roles for increasing its pupolation until 2050.
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 67
- The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because more than half percent of people who lived in there were between 0 and 14...
^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the society has 61.6% adult, nearly 25% elderly and just less than a quarter you...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68656716418 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17393011143 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.961472725 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164925624418 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094956253148 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682110110772 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145704142482 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649736061229 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.