Some individuals are of the opinion that some types of work would be more suitable for either men or women due to their natural differences. The rest, nevertheless, claim that people of both genders are equal candidates to do any job they want. Although both views hold merit, I agree more with the former/latter perspective.
The reason why some people believe that one gender or the other is more suitable to do some types of job comes from their mental and physical differences. On the one hand, women are believed to be more emotionally sensitive, which gives them an edge when dealing with other people, making them perfect candidates for jobs requiring dealing with customers. Men, on the other hand, have the physical advantage that can ensure them through labor-intensive jobs.
Others, on the other hand, think that people of both genders can be qualified candidates for all types of jobs because of their ability to adapt. All humans are highly adaptive, which means that their strengths can be adjusted according to their needs. When people are enrolled in a job, they would gradually develop their skills to the point that they can execute the job efficiently. This is why anyone, either male or female, can have equal chances of excelling at any job they want.
In conclusion, although there are controversial opinions on determining the role of gender when it comes to the compatibility with a job, I think that they are heavily correlated. The reason is that each gender has a set of unique attributes that can fit perfectly into a job’s requirements. This is why people should be cognizant of the differences before choosing their jobs
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes Suggest some solutions 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y want. Although both views hold merit, I agree more with the former/latter persp...
^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... comes to the compatibility with a job, I think that they are heavily correlated....
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9605734767 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72457549398 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501792114695 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9637174577 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32717875044 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11729637135 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858161412278 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205964560829 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987793485811 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.