Should advertisements use sad or happy or both types of pictures when advertising for charity organizations?
I think using both types of images will be the most effective method. First, the usage of sad images can touch people's emotions and evoke attention and support for charitable causes. To be specific, commercials of people who have incurable or hard-to-cured diseases can reflect the plight of people who are under the torment of illness and their desire for a healthy life and can inspire support for the welfare and rehabilitation treatment of people with disabilities since people will pity them. Second, happy pictures can inspire people's optimism and hope by showcasing the positive impact and changes brought about by charitable activities, thereby encouraging more people to participate in charitable activities. For example, displaying images of beneficiaries' recovery or happiness can allow people to see the actual effects of charitable work, thereby increasing trust and support for charitable organizations. In a nutshell, utilizing both types of pictures is the best way to promote people participating in charity organizations.
- Explain how the lecture refutes the reason that the passage states about smart cars 85
- Should charity organizations use sad or happy or both types of pictures as advertisements 60
- Assignments are indispensable on our part for children as they grow up it has become a routine students do the work and teachers correct the position Some people believe that the assignments should be restrained while others support the opposite opinion T 61
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage 3
- Yellow legged Mountain Frog As yellow legged mountain frogs become a member of the endangered species the reasons why they are disappearing still remain a mystery to scientists Although a few theories have been presented in the passage they are still inco 84
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 5
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 159 150
No. of Characters: 870 1000
No. of Different Words: 99 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.551 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.472 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.024 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.42 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.497 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.18 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 1