Should advertisements use sad or happy or both types of pictures when advertising for charity organizations?
I think using both types of images will be the most effective method. First, the usage of sad images can touch people's emotions and evoke attention and support for charitable causes. To be specific, commercials of people who have incurable or hard-to-cured diseases can reflect the plight of people who are under the torment of illness and their desire for a healthy life and can inspire support for the welfare and rehabilitation treatment of people with disabilities since people will pity them. Second, happy pictures can inspire people's optimism and hope by showcasing the positive impact and changes brought about by charitable activities, thereby encouraging more people to participate in charitable activities. For example, displaying images of beneficiaries' recovery or happiness can allow people to see the actual effects of charitable work, thereby increasing trust and support for charitable organizations. In a nutshell, utilizing both types of pictures is the best way to promote people participating in charity organizations.
- Female and Male Equal It is time that we all see gender as a spectrum instead of two sets of opposing ideals Emma Watson a noted British actor once said People may not link it with forcing females and males to go to separate schools Still if you look deep 65
- Should charity organizations use sad or happy or both types of pictures as advertisements 60
- Assignments are indispensable on our part for children as they grow up it has become a routine students do the work and teachers correct the position Some people believe that the assignments should be restrained while others support the opposite opinion T 61
- Assignments are indispensable on our part for children as they grow up it has become a routine students do the work and teachers correct the position Some people believe that the assignments should be restrained while others support the opposite opinion T 61
- Independence or Not 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 5
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 159 150
No. of Characters: 870 1000
No. of Different Words: 99 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.551 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.472 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.024 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.42 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.497 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.18 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 1