The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant.

The barchart demonstrates the amount of spend money by the four catagories age groups of British citizens on three types in 2004.

On the whole, it is clear that as age advanced, the spending properties of people changed. Older age groups spent more money on Food and drink and Entertainment, but the vice versa was not true for under 45s. Additionally, the spending on Food and drink was the least by the under 30s, and the highest by the above 76 age group.

Looking at the Food and drink data in more detail it is pronounced that the expenditure on food and drink gradually increased as age advanced. It started from around 6% to peak at approximately 23%. The amount of spending on Restaurant and hotel was the same for under 60s. They spent 12-14%. On the other side, 61-75 and 76+ groups spent around 2% and 7% respectively.

Finally, Entertainment expenditure was high for above 45 age, but the vice versa was not true for under 45 age. 61-75 age group had the highest value at around 23% and lowest value approximately 7% for the under 30 group.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 67 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 78 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 61 view
2023-04-02 cinderel view
2023-01-05 Efuli 67 view
Essays by user Sheikh Sajib :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun age seems to be countable, so consider using: '45 ages'.
Suggestion: 45 ages
...tainment expenditure was high for above 45 age, but the vice versa was not true for un...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun age seems to be countable, so consider using: '45 ages'.
Suggestion: 45 ages
...t the vice versa was not true for under 45 age. 61-75 age group had the highest value ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, look, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63492063492 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62118986729 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502645502646 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6813118038 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6363636364 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114098785591 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468263500801 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367104396543 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858479866735 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296059672104 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.