The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent by four age groups of British citizens on three categories of expenses in 2004.
Overall, it is clear that spending habits changed as people aged. Older age groups spent more on Food and Drink and Entertainment, while younger age groups spent less in these categories. Additionally, spending on Food and Drink was lowest among people under 30 and highest among the 76+ age group.
Looking more closely at the Food and Drink category, it is evident that expenditure increased with age, starting at around 6% for younger people and peaking at approximately 23% for those over 76. Spending on Restaurants and Hotels remained consistent among those under 60, ranging from 12% to 14%. On the other hand, the 61-75 and 76+ age groups spent significantly less in this category, at around 2% and 7%, respectively.
Finally, spending on Entertainment was higher for people aged 45 and above, while the reverse was true for those under 45. The 61-75 age group spent the highest percentage on Entertainment, at around 23%, whereas the under-30 group spent the least, at approximately 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | cinderel | view | |
| 2023-01-05 | Efuli | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The number of prisoner in thousands in five different countries from 1930 to 1980 67
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant 67
- Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08510638298 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77525034658 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2279816635 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141529653471 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699186790218 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056694573997 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11080768874 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546100484898 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.