The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of adults in five different age groups in Great Britain who used the internet daily between 2003 and 2006.
Overall, it is clear that internet usage declined as age increased throughout the period. The youngest age group, 16-24, consistently had the highest percentage of daily internet users, while those aged 65 and over had the lowest. Additionally, all age groups showed an upward trend in internet usage over the four years, with some fluctuations in certain age groups.
In detail, the 16-24 age group started at 80% in 2003, remained the same in 2004, before peaking at 100% in 2005. However, it experienced a slight decline to about 90% in 2006. For the 25-44 age group, there was a steady increase in daily internet usage, rising from 50% in 2003 to just under 80% in 2006.
Similarly, in the 45-54 age group, internet usage grew steadily from around 60% in 2003 to 80% in 2006. The 55-64 age group, however, showed more variation, starting at approximately 30% in 2003 and climbing to around 50% in 2006, with a steady increase each year.
Finally, internet usage among those aged 65 and over remained the lowest throughout the period. In 2003, only about 10% of this age group used the internet daily, increasing slightly to around 15% by 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant 61
- Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whare relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86995515695 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4712873885 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5131824152 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30036530739 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133858925046 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814093155228 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204281608318 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720941798223 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.