Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I mostly agree with the prompt for two reasons outlined below. Admittedly I do concede that certain scientific endeavours that might affect the fate of entire humanity, must be tightly regulated by the officials.
First of all, goverments should not place any restrictions on scientific research and development because it leads to development of technology that aids humans in a myriad of ways. For instance the invention of Aeroplane by the Wright Brothers completely changed the way people travelled, the distance between two places was of no significance and people living in one corner of the world could visit another corner of the world in a significantly less time. Moreover, the invention of telephone, is yet another archetype of technological marvel, that revolutionised how people communicated with each other. Similar to aircrafts this invention dissolved the limitation of physcial distance that stood in the way for commmunication to take place between distant people.
Such technological developements has completely revamped the lives of people to an extent where we have been so much reliant on these devices and technology that life without them is quite difficult to imagine and therefore curbing these development would be egregious.
Second of all, scientific research should not be hindered by the goverments because the it increases life expectancy of humans through medical advancements and technology. For instance, the development of vaccines such as the Covid-19 vaccines saved plenty of lives worldwide. Had there been restrictions on such pivotal reseach, many innnocent lives would have been lost and battling such deadly viruses would have been a daunting task.
However, I do concede that certain scientific endeavours must be monitored by the governments because they are of national importance and any mishap in such research would proove fatal to not only the nations but also for the entire world. For instance the Chernobyl Accident, a nuclear disaster in which a plethora of people lost their lives, was a dark moment in science as this situation would have not have taken place, if it were carefully monitored and its progress was check by the officials.
In conclusion, while there are only some events in which governent checks have proven to beneficial, a majority of technological advancements and medical research woould not have been possible if they were limited by the goverment
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 83
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
I mostly agree with the prompt for two re...
^
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... two reasons outlined below. Admittedly I do concede that certain scientific ende...
^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this development' or 'these developments'?
Suggestion: this development; these developments
...ficult to imagine and therefore curbing these development would be egregious. Second of all, s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 10, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...have been a daunting task. However, I do concede that certain scientific ende...
^
Line 8, column 407, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...cience as this situation would have not have taken place, if it were carefully monit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37075718016 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96359714826 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530026109661 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.095025545 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.230769231 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4615384615 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183687472848 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696471595363 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532126839284 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088927251633 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238540410877 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.