The question is: The graph below shows the way in which men and women used the Internet in Canada in 2000. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart given makes a comparison among Canadian males and females, of 15-24 age group, in terms of six different usages of the Internet in only 2000.
While Internet usaged in email had the highest level, Research and education was the least percentage. Overall, women were ahead than men in using for emailing and online shoping, but all other activities makes superseded women.
As can be seen from the graph, the maximum number of men used the Internet for Goods and services, this percentage was 71%. The second most popular use among maes was for sending emails, it stood at 70%, a slightly higher percentage of women (71%) used Internet for emails. However, 61% of women used Internet for goods and sevices which was a significantly lesser percentage.
Turning to the remaining datasets, Chat rooms were almost equally popular among both genders with 50% males and 48% females respectively. One in ten women chose the Internet than man for online shoping. In contrast, Games were slightly more popular among males, which was 6% higher than females. Research and education was not as popular as others, 9% women and 13% men used the Internet for this purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-11 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The question is The graph below shows the way in which men and women used the Internet in Canada in 2000 Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 78
- The number of prisoner in thousands in five different countries from 1930 to 1980 67
- Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98984771574 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42522750789 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0238352285 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217084602963 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965945563401 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539499920679 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13588189384 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246867035796 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98984771574 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42522750789 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0238352285 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217084602963 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965945563401 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539499920679 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13588189384 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246867035796 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.