The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of car ownership in the UK from 1971 to 2007.
What stands out from the graph is that while the percentage of households without a car in Great Britain experienced a significant decline, the figures for those owning two or more cars surged over the 36-year period. In addition, households with regular use of a car remained stable, while those with three or more cars consistently represented the lowest proportion during the mentioned period.
Starting at the highest point in 1971, nearly 50% of families in Britain possessed no car at all, before experiencing a significant drop to just over 25% by the end of the period. One-car owners ranked second in the country at approximately 45% at the beginning. After some fluctuations, this figure remained nearly unchanged in 2007. However, it became the most popular trend in the UK during these years.
Finally, the two remaining categories of households with two or more cars, which accounted for only under 10% in 1971, showed upward trends throughout the 36-year period. The number of families with two cars, starting at around 8% in the initial year, witnessed relative progress, eventually overtaking that of no-car users to rank second at about 27% in 2007. Households with three or more cars saw a gradual increase from about 2% to around 6%, representing the lowest figure among the four categories over the same period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-20 | kimmy.071411 | 40 | view |
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 67
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04237288136 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74478168287 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3475397746 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147351351373 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707517397487 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683441760669 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125754280236 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757761390831 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.