In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, it appears that the availability of globally grown produce has become more prevalent in different parts of the world. While some view this trend as positive, I would argue that it is predominantly negative due to food safety issues and considerable repercussions for local farmers.
One compelling argument in favor of the increased popularity of food produced globally is it can provide consumers with a broader range of dietary and nutritional choices. In the distant past, there was limited access to food options, resulting in a monotonous diet with only several locally produced foods. However, with the increased access to food products from different corners of the globe, people nowadays can experience significantly more diverse cuisines and flavors from different cultures regardless of seasons. Additionally, it provides a variety of healthy options which allow consumers to select foods that meet their special dietary needs and preferences throughout the year. For example, Vietnamese consumers now can enjoy strawberries at any time as they can buy strawberries imported from different countries, which seemed to be impossible in the past.
Nonetheless, the easy availability of food produced globally poses food safety risks and is detrimental for local farmers. First, as food quality control can be more challenging with global supply chains, food safety issues are a huge concern. Food traveling across borders potentially leads to increased risks of contamination and foodborne illnesses, seriously threatening consumers’ health. Another problem is when consumers prefer imported goods over locally grown products, it would result in a decline in demand for local agricultural produce. Consequently, local farmers can face financial difficulties and struggle to sustain their livelihoods. In Vietnam, many tomato growers have sold their farmland to seek new jobs because they are unable to compete with imported tomatoes from Thailand and China.
In conclusion, despite some benefits related to nutritional and dietary options, the harmful consequences of internationally imported food are more significant. Therefore, I believe this is a negative development overall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
- With the advancement in technology the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 84
- In some cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 56
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...While some view this trend as positive, I would argue that it is predominantly ne...
^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...d food are more significant. Therefore, I believe this is a negative development ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76146788991 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05610944131 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1489528847 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216313976238 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734782378524 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352777022078 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126513070383 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179603466824 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.