In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem. What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
It is widely believed that the massive stream of traffic in many urban areas worldwide is now considered an acute problem. In my opinion, there are many remarkable reasons and significant solutions for this phenomenon.
To start with, the increase in private vehicles probably has an enormous effect on this issue. Specifically, it comes/stems from a core recognition that personal vehicles are much more convenient than other means of transport. Take the bus as an example; this kind of public transport may be more time-consuming or complicated than other private transport such as motorbikes, and cars. What is more, overpopulation in urban areas would also be one of the most convincing reasons. In other words, the more city dweller there are, the higher number of traffic participants would be. Especially in rush hour, when the demand for moving is essential, the volume of traffic is extremely high.
A number of definite actions could be taken to mitigate the problem above, especially the responsibility of the government. For one thing, authorities may have to encourage the use of public transport widely. Specifically, they could subsidize sharply in this field by developing the quality and quantity of each vehicle. By doing this, more and more people/residents might tend to commute by these means of transport instead of using their own vehicles. For other things, politics should enact some laws in terms of encouraging people to settle down in suburban areas. In detail, nations might have to boost the life quality in these regions by creating more employment opportunities or developing the infrastructure, and road conditions. Consequently, the traffic burden in cities could be cut down.
In conclusion, the thick traffic generally comes/stems from the increase in population and private vehicles. However, applying the proper political strategies would be the key method to manage this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | linh allie | 56 | view |
- The line graph shows the information for internet users as percentage of population in three countries from 1999 and 2009 78
- Many people think that It is a good idea for teenagers to have jobs while they are still students while others believe that they had better focus on their study Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 89
- In recent years there has been an increase in bad behavior poor discipline and antisocial behavior in schools Tough measures and stricter punishments by schools parents and others are necessary to stop this trend What are the advantages and disadvantages 84
- Many people think that bottled water should be banned Do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant solutions for this phenomenon. To start with, the increase in private v...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...ople/residents might tend to commute by these means of transport instead of using their own...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, for one thing, in my opinion, in other words, to start with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3696369637 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03422945369 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587458745875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6585241507 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7058823529 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215615538192 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643545460092 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433410415517 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11842054098 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215775813129 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.