Recent incursions by deep-sea fisherman into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, the population should not return to the levels before the fishing boats arrived. Because this trend is expected to continue over the next several years, the Madagascan shrimp will quickly become an endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument contends that since the invasion into the Madagascan shrimp habitat by the deep-sea fisherman, the shrimp population are decreasing significantly. The author concludes that the Madagascan shrimp would become an endangered animals soon. However, there are lacking some essential information to properly appraise this argument and which rendering the argument a little unconvincing.
First of all, the writer cites that the incursions of the fisherman affect the local species and lower their populations. Nevertheless, there is no direct causation between a change in the ecosystem and a dramatic decrease of a species. Many species have the abilities to fit into new or a little changed ecosystem after a short term of adjust which might causing decreasing at first. Probably, after they are suitable to the new environment, they could be prosperous like before.
Secondly, the author avers that the population would restore to their regular level again. Nonetheless, there are normal phenomenon that population would increasing in some season but decreasing in other seasons. Therefore, the drop caused by the fisherman still would be balanced in the next restoring season or cycle. It is possible that the invasion time accidentally meets the decrease term in the shrimp life cycle.
Finally, the author predicts that the Madagascan shrimp would become endanger very soon because the trend might continue for following years. Notwithstanding, there is no direct relation between a decrease for a short time and a continue decrease for a long term. Perhaps, the shrimp population would recover every year, then they would not become less year by year. As a result, they could still be back to their regular life cycle.
To sum up, the argument is plausible before the author provide more and accurate pieces of evidence. The writer should offer detailed information about the Madagascan shrimp restore abilities and their life cycle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Deepanshu Dewangan | 37 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | bharadwaj98 | 65 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | solankis304 | 23 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | aneela | 23 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 58 | view |
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council. "An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East 60
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 70
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client."Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienc 80
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee Recently there have been discussions about ending Grove College s century old tradition of all fema 27
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
which might causing decreasing at first.
which might cause decreasing at first.
Sentence: However, there are lacking some essential information to properly appraise this argument and which rendering the argument a little unconvincing.
Description: A WH-determiner is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to which and rendering
Sentence: First of all, the writer cites that the incursions of the fisherman affect the local species and lower their populations.
Description: The fragment fisherman affect the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace affect with verb, past tense
Sentence: Many species have the abilities to fit into new or a little changed ecosystem after a short term of adjust which might causing decreasing at first.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to of and adjust
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to might and causing
Sentence: Nonetheless, there are normal phenomenon that population would increasing in some season but decreasing in other seasons.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to would and increasing
Sentence: Notwithstanding, there is no direct relation between a decrease for a short time and a continue decrease for a long term.
Description: The token a is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to a and continue
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- not clear: 'the population would restore to their regular level again.'
argument 3 -- not clear: 'between a decrease for a short time and a continue decrease for a long term.'
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 306 350
No. of Characters: 1606 1500
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.182 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.248 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.343 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.566 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5