Recent incursions by deep-sea fisherman into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, the population should not return to the levels before the fishing boats arrived. Because this trend is expected to continue over the next several years, the Madagascan shrimp will quickly become an endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument contends that since the invasion into the Madagascan shrimp habitat by the deep-sea fisherman, the shrimp population are decreasing significantly. The author concludes that the Madagascan shrimp would become an endangered animals soon. However, there are lacking some essential information to properly appraise this argument and which rendering the argument a little unconvincing.
First of all, the writer cites that the incursions of the fisherman affect the local species and lower their populations. Nevertheless, there is no direct causation between a change in the ecosystem and a dramatic decrease of a species. Many species have the abilities to fit into new or a little changed ecosystem after a short term of adjust which might causing decreasing at first. Probably, after they are suitable to the new environment, they could be prosperous like before.
Secondly, the author avers that the population would restore to their regular level again. Nonetheless, there are normal phenomenon that population would increasing in some season but decreasing in other seasons. Therefore, the drop caused by the fisherman still would be balanced in the next restoring season or cycle. It is possible that the invasion time accidentally meets the decrease term in the shrimp life cycle.
Finally, the author predicts that the Madagascan shrimp would become endanger very soon because the trend might continue for following years. Notwithstanding, there is no direct relation between a decrease for a short time and a continue decrease for a long term. Perhaps, the shrimp population would recover every year, then they would not become less year by year. As a result, they could still be back to their regular life cycle.
To sum up, the argument is plausible before the author provide more and accurate pieces of evidence. The writer should offer detailed information about the Madagascan shrimp restore abilities and their life cycle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Deepanshu Dewangan | 37 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | bharadwaj98 | 65 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | solankis304 | 23 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | aneela | 23 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 58 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 50
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans general 50
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fisherman into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 50
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 50
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a significa 60
which might causing decreasing at first.
which might cause decreasing at first.
Sentence: However, there are lacking some essential information to properly appraise this argument and which rendering the argument a little unconvincing.
Description: A WH-determiner is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to which and rendering
Sentence: First of all, the writer cites that the incursions of the fisherman affect the local species and lower their populations.
Description: The fragment fisherman affect the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace affect with verb, past tense
Sentence: Many species have the abilities to fit into new or a little changed ecosystem after a short term of adjust which might causing decreasing at first.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to of and adjust
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to might and causing
Sentence: Nonetheless, there are normal phenomenon that population would increasing in some season but decreasing in other seasons.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to would and increasing
Sentence: Notwithstanding, there is no direct relation between a decrease for a short time and a continue decrease for a long term.
Description: The token a is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to a and continue
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- not clear: 'the population would restore to their regular level again.'
argument 3 -- not clear: 'between a decrease for a short time and a continue decrease for a long term.'
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 306 350
No. of Characters: 1606 1500
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.182 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.248 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.343 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.566 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5