In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some may argue that to help students to become sophisticated and mature people, schools should require all students to take poetry, mythology, and some literature courses. A discussion of required courses is important since it relates to students' development. However, in my stance, I do not agree that every student has to be forced to take certain literature classes for the following reasons.
First of all, maybe some students could take literature courses to aid them become more sophisticated, but not all because some other students might already well-rounded people. Therefore, some mature students might not need to spend time to render them better people. To illustrate, if someone, who might already pored over the required poetry, novels, mythology, and literature, is asked to take certain courses which the person already learned, it will waste the time of the person and does not gain more advantages.
Moreover, students have their major and related courses to take. If schools ask all the students to go to literature classes, some students might be forced to take too many classes since they need to take both their majors and literature classes, such as engineering plus literature. All classes can aid students to comprehend more and progress. Nevertheless, schools would not arrange students to take all classes for the time limit.
Admittedly, literature classes could broaden students' minds and help them become advanced. Nonetheless, there are many other classes would also benefit students a lot and make them well-rounded. Literature is not the sole material to benefit students’ mind. For instance, psychology teaches students to apprehend people's thinking and pedagogy allows students to care about other learners. All classes could help students. Hence, taking literature might not be the only one option.
To sum up, although literature could offer students copious knowledge and help them be better, there are many other courses also provide advantages. Thus, they could take other courses to help them. Besides, some might not need literature classes to improve their mind since they are already sophisticated people. As a result, requiring all students to take literature courses might not be a good choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | AAAA2222 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | kobiniloy74 | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | Rida Rajani | 79 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | Lucybrian | 58 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | GREdestroyer | 66 | view |
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a significa 80
- GRE:To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 60
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 40
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals."One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top-selling cereal companies. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
flaws:
need more content. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 353 350
No. of Characters: 1836 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.335 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.201 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.571 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.65 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.205 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.201 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
Some may argue that to help students to become sophist...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241895261845 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.177057356608 0.157235817809 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0798004987531 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0623441396509 0.0497285424764 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0399002493766 0.0444667217837 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0498753117207 0.12292977631 41% => More prepositions wanted.
Participles: 0.0199501246883 0.0406280797675 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.71472956271 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0623441396509 0.030933414821 202% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00249376558603 0.0016655270985 150% => OK
Determiners: 0.072319201995 0.0997080785238 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0448877805486 0.0249443105267 180% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00498753117207 0.0148568991511 34% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2250.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 353.0 452.878318584 78% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.37393767705 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402266288952 0.366273622748 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.354107648725 0.280924506359 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212464589235 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124645892351 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71472956271 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 219.290929204 75% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467422096317 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 48.1260237581 55.4138127331 87% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.65 23.380412469 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2783039901 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 23.380412469 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05 0.674092028746 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 53.0607648725 51.4728631049 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.11607142857 1.64882698954 68% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400628840535 0.391690518653 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114693463309 0.123202303941 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0713942552279 0.077325440228 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.5548901825 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120528857275 0.149214159877 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158389119911 0.161403998019 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617821586602 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.446516492772 0.385218514788 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0155027299702 0.0692045440612 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275819337992 0.275328986314 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527059524623 0.0653680567796 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.