People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
In this issue, statement is given for decision making method by which person is judged. I agree with given statement, because most of time it is true. Author is stating that Person is poor decision maker if, person is making decisions based on emotion and then it is justifying with logic.
Here, author is stating that decision which is made by first emotion and then you are justifying with logic is poor decision making ability. I agree because, a decision which is taken when you are emotional than it is alarmic situation. Because at that time you are not thinking with all possible direction of problem. There is a chance of failing of your decision. If you are making decision first by emotion and then explaining it with logic may fall wrong if your decision at the time of thinking with emotion fails.
For example, in a play of sports, if any opposite team player challenges you and you are taking decision very aggressively than it might prove wrong to you. At this situation, you must think first logically. You should first think that, am i having enough player that can play with you having enough strength? If it is yes than you should make decision accordingly. If you are first solving problem emotionally, and by chance if you lose the game and at the end, you are explaining with logic is actually illogical. Here, you will be proved as poor decision maker.
This will be true every time is not necessary. Because if you are not emotional and taking decision, and then your decision fall wrong if you have not considered all the parameters affecting it. In this case, you are not poor decision maker by statement.
So, it will depend on the situation but most of the times this statement holds true. I can conclude that first a person should make decision without any emotion because that may lead you to false. After giving poor decision, if you are telling logically is not logically.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that the person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot per 50
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...emotional than it is alarmic situation. Because at that time you are not thinking with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n play with you having enough strength? If it is yes than you should make decision...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'actually', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.185483870968 0.240241500013 77% => OK
Verbs: 0.204301075269 0.157235817809 130% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0698924731183 0.0880659088768 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0645161290323 0.0497285424764 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0913978494624 0.0444667217837 206% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.150537634409 0.12292977631 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0752688172043 0.0406280797675 185% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.43445104094 2.79330140395 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00537634408602 0.030933414821 17% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0564516129032 0.0997080785238 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0322580645161 0.0249443105267 129% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134408602151 0.0148568991511 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1913.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 336.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69345238095 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3125 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.217261904762 0.280924506359 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160714285714 0.200843997647 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0922619047619 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43445104094 2.79330140395 87% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 219.290929204 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41369047619 0.48968727796 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.1783659063 55.4138127331 74% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1776722126 59.4972553346 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.65 141.124799967 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 38.5261904762 51.4728631049 75% => OK
Elegance: 1.14179104478 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209461062266 0.391690518653 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163042806942 0.123202303941 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.129677388988 0.077325440228 168% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546597687976 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130848049249 0.149214159877 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824204395109 0.161403998019 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639583004184 0.0892212321368 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422938027132 0.385218514788 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.06292718501 0.0692045440612 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140578613891 0.275328986314 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338930548631 0.0653680567796 52% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
---------------------
It is not right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.