In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.
In today's modern world, the process of publishing news and information is dramatically more convenient in comparison to that of the past, and there are a great deal of news sources such as newspapers and Internet, which play a vital role in human beings thinking. With this in mind, some people believe that it stands to reason that one should get information from various sources so as to be well-informed, while others hold the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the first attitude carries more weight for quite a few reasons, three substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that one can enjoy a better understanding about subjects with acquiring information from different sources, for various news sources interpret issues from their own aspects. I clarify my point with the story that happened to me: two years ago, in the news regarding fire in a school in a small town. Different newspaper had surveyed the incident from different angels. Some believed that the major culprit of fire in the school is education minister who did not allocate enough budget to schools in order to provide suitable warming equipment, while others accused the teacher who had not paid attention to heater's problem. I read many newspapers which helped me to achieve a proper understanding about the firiring incident.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the latter perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that the majority of news sources tend to a specific political party; therefore, this tendency may affect the way that they report issues. Unless one survey different news sources concerning a subject, it is possible that he (or she) cannot have a fair view regarding it. For example, five months ago, a political party was accused by people to spend money, gathered from individuals to distribute it among poor people, in the elective advertisements. I read news sources form both supported and opposite view which aid me to think and decide unbiasedly, but if I had read only news from one arguing side, I would have a bias judgment, and think that the political party is sinful.
All in all, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that in order to be well-informed, it is necessary to acquire information from different sources on the grounds that it gives one a chance not only to enjoy a better understanding about subjects, but also to judge issues fairly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...that of the past, and there are a great deal of news sources such as newspapers and ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ld get information from various sources so as to be well-informed, while others hold the...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223175965665 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.163090128755 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0965665236052 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0450643776824 0.046263068375 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.049356223176 0.0685040099705 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130901287554 0.118717715034 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0429184549356 0.0351676179071 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90580608854 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0364806866953 0.0309702414327 118% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0944206008584 0.0887237588012 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0107296137339 0.0209618222197 51% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0171673819742 0.0139019557991 123% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2512.0 2387.08602151 105% => OK
No of words: 419.0 408.028673835 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99522673031 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360381861575 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272076372315 0.251872472559 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198090692124 0.174417080927 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140811455847 0.112833075102 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90580608854 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54892601432 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 63.7522083488 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6684587814 63% => OK
Sentence length: 32.2307692308 20.5533526081 157% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6382702671 48.84282405 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.230769231 120.699889404 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2307692308 20.5533526081 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 59.4384064623 45.7405998639 130% => OK
Elegance: 1.54166666667 1.45489161554 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316879785833 0.300154397459 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0631387618299 0.103427244359 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0257386212439 0.0752933317313 34% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554282601881 0.497263757937 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171290428183 0.151897553556 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135430536088 0.114077575197 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743562226565 0.0781384742642 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.373050006368 0.336927656856 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0427882898707 0.067059652881 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228939741655 0.210909579961 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368040225765 0.0618886996521 59% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8870967742 34% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 8.42114695341 36% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.