Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education plays a major role in deciding the career of students. Fields of study decides the career of an individual. In certain fields career seems quite lucrative, financially.
Career is important for every person. When student chose a field for which career is not at all good and if students don't get jobs after their education is complete, institutes' reputation also get affected. In this case students can regret their decision. This possibility motivates institutes to encourage students to take careers into account. So institutes decisions to encourage students to choose field based on lucrative career seems justified.
But is the education's sole motive is to earn money?
In case when educational institutes encourage students to choose some preferred fields then talented students who could have done great in a particular field of their interest will be choosing the fields based on the money. People will be working in fields which do not interest them. This is neither good for those fields nor for students as when they get the money they might regret their decision in future because of lack of satisfaction. The fields which do not have lucrative career will also suffer from lack of students and there will be acute shortage of professional in those fields. This will create a balance shift in market. The fields which were lucrative once will have abundance of workforce and will become less paying.
Students should study the fields where their interests lie. Educational institutes' aim should be providing quality education for all the fields. I
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | z.salahshoor | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | kook | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | ko_tik | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | dvtien95 | 50 | view |
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 41
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...reer is not at all good and if students dont get jobs after their education is compl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...cisions to encourage students to choose field based on lucrative career seems justifi...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262773722628 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.182481751825 0.157235817809 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0802919708029 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.043795620438 0.0497285424764 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0328467153285 0.0444667217837 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116788321168 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.029197080292 0.0406280797675 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62635036942 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021897810219 0.030933414821 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0875912408759 0.0997080785238 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.043795620438 0.0249443105267 176% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0328467153285 0.0148568991511 221% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1576.0 2732.02544248 58% => OK
No of words: 255.0 452.878318584 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18039215686 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.58838876751 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388235294118 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270588235294 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21568627451 0.200843997647 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149019607843 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62635036942 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 219.290929204 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 49.3511268329 55.4138127331 89% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.1666666667 23.380412469 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0780186283 59.4972553346 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5555555556 141.124799967 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 23.380412469 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.277777777778 0.674092028746 41% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 41.2254901961 51.4728631049 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.57746478873 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409805240974 0.391690518653 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132666600935 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0788570067482 0.077325440228 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.539980282793 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.21475279176 0.149214159877 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145264465602 0.161403998019 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696882845468 0.0892212321368 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.160447756037 0.385218514788 42% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.054198832856 0.0692045440612 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222459841398 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894110303031 0.0653680567796 137% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.