People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Since stone age man has been an adventurous creature, taking risks while hunting animals, travelling through forest and even tasting unkown fruits, stems and roots of plants. In todays world he takes risk in the form of investing, be it investing in stocks, investing efforts in a doubtful project or even investing his life.
People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Let us take an example of stunt man who performs dangerous tasks like walking through fire, crashing cars or doing somersaults in a bike. These people are taking a huge risk with their life. They should understand that though medical aid is present at their disposal, it does not eliminate all chance of accidents. In fact accidents are frequent. It could cost them their life, or loose their limbs or suffer severe burns. They should think about what they should do if they end up in such a situation. They may be well paid, or may even be granted pension for the rest of their life, but is that the life they would like to live? Are they really ok staying in the wheel chair for a lifetime for a price? One should ponder upon such questions before taking such huge risks.
Also, people who invest in stocks or real estate or new ventures, should do so cautiosly. They should try and find out about the history of the company, about the kind of people who run it, the status quo and the values they uphold. Only after careful thought should they be willing to part with their hard earned savings. Ofcourse this does not gaurantee success or profits, but one can take satisfaction in the fact that they did proper market research and there was atleast a satisfactory chance of their risks bearing fruits. Also one should hedge his bets and not invest everything at one place. This avoids cases where all is lost. One has should not invest all his has, but only the money he has excess. He should also give a thought about the life-style changes he is willing to make, incase he is in the worst possible scenario.
However, we can argue that not all consequences can be thought about before risking, the outcome is unknown and it could be completely different from what one could foresee. This is true, but think of what is the worst that could occur; prepare for that. Sometimes thinking on these lines gives one courage to approach the situation. Over thinnking about the results of their action, many people feel reluctance, then they otherwise would. But this is good when one is risking his life. In other cases like investment, if one thinks about the worst that can occur, it can actually exhort him to take action.
Thus one should always undertake risky action after considering its consequences, preparing for it, and only then going ahead with it. No one would like to be in a situation where they are sufferring from losses and initially there were higher stakes. Take risks but do not take ludicrous ones, the ones involving life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Shams Tarek | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | shahryar2222 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mussob34 | 16 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | kimmj0501 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | helxing | 54 | view |
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 66
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 76
- People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your opinion. 77
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 63
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...uent. It could cost them their life, or loose their limbs or suffer severe burns. The...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...es, should do so cautiosly. They should try and find out about the history of the compa...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...y chance of their risks bearing fruits. Also one should hedge his bets and not inves...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... actually exhort him to take action. Thus one should always undertake risky actio...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.192708333333 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.184027777778 0.157235817809 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0659722222222 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0590277777778 0.0497285424764 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.078125 0.0444667217837 176% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.111111111111 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0503472222222 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.3355621494 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0104166666667 0.030933414821 34% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00173611111111 0.0016655270985 104% => OK
Determiners: 0.0729166666667 0.0997080785238 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0451388888889 0.0249443105267 181% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0190972222222 0.0148568991511 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2976.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 519.0 452.878318584 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73410404624 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31021194605 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.198458574181 0.280924506359 71% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.123314065511 0.200843997647 61% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0905587668593 0.132149295362 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3355621494 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 219.290929204 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520231213873 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 62.8865350069 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6194690265 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8965517241 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4924977641 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.620689655 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8965517241 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.48275862069 0.674092028746 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 37.7424091422 51.4728631049 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.1027027027 1.64882698954 67% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222551143109 0.391690518653 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0559095755451 0.123202303941 45% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0603414138674 0.077325440228 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.424562660224 0.547984918172 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165187184892 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830656765785 0.161403998019 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185976240728 0.0892212321368 208% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.214123698717 0.385218514788 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.144962894411 0.0692045440612 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248713511873 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.341826005528 0.0653680567796 523% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.30420353982 264% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 3.66592920354 273% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.