tpo 42
Without any shadow of doubt, choosing and commencing a job is an inevitable juncture in the life of most human beings, for nowadays, it is impossible to have even a simple life without money. People are inclined to various jobs according to their personalities, ages, skills, and traditions, to name but a few. With this in mind, some believe that it stands to reason that it is better for workers to do different kinds of task than doing same tasks in all days, while others hold the opposite view. I, personally, subscribe to the first attitude based on quite a few reasons, two of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that in today's modern world, every company has to be in rush so as not to be left behind in contending for "field of competition" in order to gain more market shares, which brings them about profit, and thus fortune. Innovation plays a pivotal role in acquiring more market shares. It is statistically proven that most leading companies enjoy bigger marker share due to their innovative employees. As a result, companies need innovative employees to help them to reach their goals, resulting in achieving more market share. Doing various tasks gives worker a chance not only to expand their knowledge through leaning new issues, but also to provide their corporations with fresh ideas. Moreover, experiencing different tasks helps workers to be more mentally healthy in general and to improve their skills in particular, which leads to higher salary for them; or, to put it in another way, the more skillful one is, the higher income he or she enjoys. According to a research conducted in one of the most reputable universities in my country, individuals who are in better financial situation are happier.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the latter perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that while workers do same tasks, even though they can be more professional in those tasks, it would be boring in a long time. I clarify my point of view with a real story that happened to me last year. I was working in library as typist. Even though most of time I was free and had a good income, I felt gloomy with it, and it made me disappointed. Therefore, I decided to abandon my job and find new one. Now, I am working in company as a sale manager. Although I should work hard, I am really into my job due to the fact that I am often supposed to learn and try new things.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that the merits of experiencing various tasks by workers outweigh those of doing same tasks on the grounds that it assists workers to be more mentally healthy, to be paid higher revenue, to enjoy more from their life and their workplaces that brings them about happiness, which is the cornerstone of welfare.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-15 | TOEFLpreparation | 60 | view |
| 2020-10-21 | neda77aa | 3 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | ericandlf2 | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | amininilooffar | 83 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | Nomun | 65 | view |
- extra 1 70
- tp0 28 70
- it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to have specialize in one specific subject 86
- TPO 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important for the young people than theyare to the older people. 73
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'in general', 'in particular', 'in summary', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.194736842105 0.229887763892 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.164912280702 0.158761421928 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.105263157895 0.0866891130778 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0526315789474 0.046263068375 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0754385964912 0.0685040099705 110% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133333333333 0.118717715034 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0508771929825 0.0351676179071 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76995295001 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0491228070175 0.0309702414327 159% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0666666666667 0.0887237588012 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00526315789474 0.0209618222197 25% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0140350877193 0.0139019557991 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2925.0 2387.08602151 123% => OK
No of words: 508.0 408.028673835 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75787401575 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334645669291 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.238188976378 0.251872472559 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.153543307087 0.174417080927 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110236220472 0.112833075102 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76995295001 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53937007874 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 65.9457419613 59.2087087015 111% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.7368421053 20.5533526081 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.8072795406 48.84282405 190% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.947368421 120.699889404 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7368421053 20.5533526081 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.644075263715 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 50.5557397431 45.7405998639 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.29341317365 1.45489161554 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.089056916953 0.103427244359 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0708840337701 0.0752933317313 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.485221484988 0.497263757937 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182794550248 0.151897553556 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.399645655132 0.336927656856 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0495692273107 0.067059652881 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.