traditional encyclopedias vs online ones
In the passage three main problems of online encyclopedias are represented. These three issues are correctness of online articles, vandalism and emphasizing on not really important topics. The professor criticizes these issues. She gives some reasons against the ideas in the lecture to show that online encyclopedias are better than traditional ones in some cases.
First and foremost, it should be notified that traditional encyclopedias are not one hundred percent correct. In fact errors can be found in them just like online ones. Even correcting errors in printed form encyclopedias is much harder and mistakes remain for a longer time but in online ones wrong information is replaced with accurate one immediately without forcing any extra expense or time.
Second, it is obvious that spoiling the information by vandalism is easier in online format but it seems that strict strategies against such actions have been neglected in the passage. These strategies include read only format for some crucial information which prevents ordinary authors from editing such information. The other strategy that can be mentioned is employing special editors who watch sensible information and decide about changes which had been made to them.
Third, as the space is limited in printed form of encyclopedias, resolving the problem of space dedicated to each entry seems to be hard but there is no such an issue in online format because in this case we have an endless space in which each topic can be negotiated vastly. In other words, diversity and including many kinds of information fields is the unique characteristics of online encyclopedias that should be taken into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Yash Mehta | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Yash Mehta | 80 | view |
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in fact', 'in other words', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238596491228 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.19298245614 0.158904122519 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.126315789474 0.0723426182421 175% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0315789473684 0.0435111971325 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0245614035088 0.0277247811725 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133333333333 0.128828473217 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0771929824561 0.0370669169778 208% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.85284613685 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0140350877193 0.0208969081088 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0877192982456 0.128158765124 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0175438596491 0.0158828679856 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0210526315789 0.0114777025283 183% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1681.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 267.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29588014981 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.404494382022 0.374372842146 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295880149813 0.287516216867 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187265917603 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138576779026 0.113142543107 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85284613685 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.539623497131 112% => OK
Word variations: 64.4666292654 53.8517498576 120% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.25 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5694606251 49.3711431718 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.083333333 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.878197800319 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 51.8380149813 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.80281690141 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185148433291 0.549887131256 34% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135189126637 0.142949733639 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0525408889158 0.0787303798458 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57447843232 0.631733273073 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143089075517 0.139662658121 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865376639501 0.266732575781 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692140184794 0.103435571967 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.234189791497 0.414875509568 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.040147704726 0.0530846634433 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135668554207 0.40443939384 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845647989899 0.0528353158467 160% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.