"Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete."
How would you rate the accuracy of the above statement? Support your position with reasons and examples.
There was a time in the past when humans are supposed to be amiable with the nature and the planet earth's environment, but eventually "we": the protectors of the nature became one of its biggest enemy, rendering environment as one of the crucial matter of concern of all times. We as humans came very far from the stone age to the industrial revolution. Albeit, achieved more than a fortune, but neglect that one of our friend,i.e., the environment is getting affected that too in a negative way.In order to cope up with this, our nation's regulators and policymakers came forward with numerous ideas and plans in order to qualify the current situation.
However, one question is profligating beneath the scenario that who are responsible for all this? Was it our greed and wanton which lead us till this point or we wanted to bring best of our minds to demonstrate our capabilities. In contrast to this we put at stake our precious environment and we are pretending to rectify our mistakes. Although the potential environmental threats includes pollution and global warming at the top of the list but there are other hazardous things to face in the near future. For example: drinking water shortage and it is the duty of our regulators and so-called policymakers to respond to the situation when it is in their hands.It is very important to deal with the situaton beforehand even before the information regarding potential environmental threats is fully known or concrete to commoners.
Furthermore, if the situation in hand becomes out of hand then we will have no control over it and things can change dratically. For example: patrons of certain city or place could face hazardous consequences just because the environment regulators did not respond to the environmental threat in time.
The thing is people have faith in these policymakers that if anything goes wrong with the circumstances they live in, these people are going to take care of them.
All in all, in order to keep our future generations safe and sound, it is necessary to handle and respond to threats regarding environment when they are just in the state of vulnerability and keep an eye on activities which are going on in the name industrial revolution so that our upcoming successors can live the life free of environmental threats and with serenity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-12 | bhaskarvemuri18 | 50 | view |
| 2017-01-12 | bhaskarvemuri18 | 16 | view |
| 2016-10-04 | cybertelic | 83 | view |
| 2016-08-20 | nikita2792 | 50 | view |
| 2016-07-23 | tonoy | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 70
- "Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete."How would you rate the accuracy of the above statement? Support your position with reasons and examples. 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 50
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 70
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , i
...tune, but neglect that one of our friend,i.e., the environment is getting affected...
^^
Line 1, column 489, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nvironment is getting affected that too in a negative way.In order to cope up with this, our nati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 507, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ing affected that too in a negative way.In order to cope up with this, our nations...
^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...the situation when it is in their hands.It is very important to deal with the situ...
^^
Line 8, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment when they are just in the state of vulnerability and keep an eye on activit...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225352112676 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.150234741784 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0821596244131 0.0880659088768 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0399061032864 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0633802816901 0.0444667217837 143% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.138497652582 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0258215962441 0.0406280797675 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95664475883 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0422535211268 0.030933414821 137% => OK
Particles: 0.00234741784038 0.0016655270985 141% => OK
Determiners: 0.0985915492958 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0093896713615 0.0249443105267 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0140845070423 0.0148568991511 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2342.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 392.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97448979592 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329081632653 0.366273622748 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267857142857 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198979591837 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.132149295362 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95664475883 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 60.0630162319 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 32.6666666667 23.380412469 140% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.5078167249 59.4972553346 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.166666667 141.124799967 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 23.380412469 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.674092028746 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 59.4523809524 51.4728631049 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.53703703704 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417198719137 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132956453361 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.072960104177 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.653746656783 0.547984918172 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.20238136968 0.149214159877 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191292635259 0.161403998019 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105794549234 0.0892212321368 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.325414358606 0.385218514788 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.118514327039 0.0692045440612 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26199171983 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812032733118 0.0653680567796 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.