Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Laws are the basic principles of our day-to-day life; hence, behavior of people should not go beyond the lines confined by laws. Laws are strong weapons to maintain peace and harmony in a society. However, everyday and every situation can be different. You cannot generalize the circumstances beyond a certain limit. Same is the case with laws. You cannot apply the same law in each situation. It has to be flexible. Change and flexibility are required for growth.
In general, there are many laws. Violation of laws can have different forms. There are different laws for different situations. However, within a particular type of crime also, the situation might be different. Hence, while taking a decision, one has to take decisions keeping in mind circumstances of a particular case. For example, it has to be considered whether a person has made an offence deliberately, unintentionally, just for fun or for money.
There are many examples in history, which make you think in favor of flexibility of laws. The latest law is one child rule in China. This law was made to control population in China. According to this law in China, each couple can have only one child. Now after the earthquake, the Chinese government is thinking about revising this law. Hence, as a society is growing and developing, proper changes in laws are required. Laws have to keep pace with the changing times.
Another example of a law changing with time is the law related to the legal heir. In ancient times, only the oldest son or only the sons of the family had the right to the family property. As time has progressed and women have started asking for their rights, law has changed and now all the offspring have equal right to the family wealth. Now a days, another aspect in this context also plays a role. That is the will of the dying person. Family wealth is distributed according to the will of the dying person.
Similarly, you cannot give the same punishment to two persons who have killed some other persons for different reasons. While one person might have killed for some personal gain and the other person could have killed to save his own life. Both the situations are entirely different. There is no doubt that fixed laws help the judges in determining whether a person is guilty or not. However, it also forces people to follow laws, as they are afraid of punishments. It instills the fear in their minds that if they do some wrong, they will be punished.
Finally, it can be said that there should be a balance between the two aspects. There should be a fixed law for every crime to guide the judges and the government to install rules and regulations. It gives the feeling of security and stability. However, at the same time, there should be flexibility when it comes to applying the laws in different circumstances. There should be a scope of modifying the existing and fading laws to give way to the development of the society and justice to people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | p30kh40 | 50 | view |
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 64
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they reach college 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves is deteriorating.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning 50
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...eace and harmony in a society. However, everyday and every situation can be different. Y...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 342, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
... have equal right to the family wealth. Now a days, another aspect in this context also pl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 346, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...e equal right to the family wealth. Now a days, another aspect in this context also pl...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in general', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235395189003 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.175257731959 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0635738831615 0.0880659088768 72% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0412371134021 0.0497285424764 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0309278350515 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.104810996564 0.12292977631 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0584192439863 0.0406280797675 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60152438328 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0343642611684 0.030933414821 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115120274914 0.0997080785238 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0309278350515 0.0249443105267 124% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00515463917526 0.0148568991511 35% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2977.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 515.0 452.878318584 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78058252427 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.32427184466 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.219417475728 0.280924506359 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.153398058252 0.200843997647 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100970873786 0.132149295362 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60152438328 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466019417476 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 54.1271529203 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 38.0 20.6194690265 184% => Less sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 13.5526315789 23.380412469 58% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.507978543 59.4972553346 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3421052632 141.124799967 56% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5526315789 23.380412469 58% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.368421052632 0.674092028746 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 35.4943791518 51.4728631049 69% => OK
Elegance: 1.61111111111 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237266274781 0.391690518653 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124607331726 0.123202303941 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.12328995041 0.077325440228 159% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.449376060679 0.547984918172 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143520253954 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793114557807 0.161403998019 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064471244847 0.0892212321368 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.333565266832 0.385218514788 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0590377716702 0.0692045440612 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159757651935 0.275328986314 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766794717633 0.0653680567796 117% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88274336283 328% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.70907079646 332% => OK
Total topic words: 25.0 13.5995575221 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.