In terms of how the great houses at Chaco were used, the reading and listening are contradictory to each other.
First, the writer makes the point that the big buildings were used for people to live in. However, the professor demonstrates a different idea that if the building were residential for people, there must be many fire places. In fact, the fire places in the building were only enough. In one of the houses, there were fireplaces for only 10 families, but there were rooms for 100.
What’s more, contrary to the belief in the reading passage that the Chaco structures were used to store maize supplies, the lecturer says that there were no traces of maize or maize containers discovered in the building.
Finally, the author states that these houses may be used as ceremonial centers. In contrast, the speaker refutes that there were not only a lot of broken pots, but also other things in the building, such as some building materials. It means these pots may be used for the workers who built the houses.
- TOEFL TPO topics - Integrated Writing TasksTPO - 06 70
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOEFL TPO topics - Integrated Writing TasksTPO - 06 73
- TPO-07 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 60
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245098039216 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.142156862745 0.158904122519 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0686274509804 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0392156862745 0.0435111971325 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00490196078431 0.0277247811725 18% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.137254901961 0.128828473217 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0294117647059 0.0370669169778 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43690743852 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0196078431373 0.0208969081088 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.132352941176 0.128158765124 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0147058823529 0.0158828679856 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0147058823529 0.0114777025283 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1028.0 1645.83664459 62% => OK
No of words: 178.0 271.125827815 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77528089888 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.04852973271 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.286516853933 0.374372842146 77% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.213483146067 0.287516216867 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151685393258 0.187439937562 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106741573034 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43690743852 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.539623497131 109% => OK
Word variations: 53.4199867894 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 19.7777777778 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4309359352 49.3711431718 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 132.220823453 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 0.878197800319 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 41.1260923845 50.5018328374 81% => OK
Elegance: 2.21052631579 1.90840788429 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.623019503639 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165275287248 0.142949733639 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0616923405276 0.0787303798458 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.72420054624 0.631733273073 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150261433527 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.33761476758 0.266732575781 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866032374727 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371311082038 0.414875509568 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0643939038657 0.0530846634433 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.463094020184 0.40443939384 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270037480611 0.0528353158467 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.