Many schools ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you think it is a good idea? Give reasons and details to support your idea.
Evaluation teacher is a form of small survey which enables schools understand students thinking and qualification of lectures. This activity is expanded in many schools nowadays. It is believed that many schools require students to access their teacher because it benefits not only students but also teachers.
To begin with, this evaluation can bring some advantages for teachers. First of all, this helps teachers to know the weaknesses. That is because only when they know their pros and cons they can change the teaching methods to satisfy the students' requirement. For example, instead of using traditional teaching methods such as giving subjects information to students, they can give students a chance to find out what subject is and why students need to know that subject. Another good side of evaluating teachers is that it enables to improve understanding between teachers and students. Students might enjoy subjects and teachers enjoy time in class instead of worrying whether students understand subjects fully or not. In addition, evaluating teachers allow teachers to get close relationship with their teacher.
Furthermore, evaluating teachers is really useful for students. One main good point of accessing teachers is that it helps students to chose teachers who they admire. For example, students will take an interesting class instead of boring class. This might be because students will get more motivation while studying in a class which they like. Another benefit of evaluation teachers is that it allows students to give feed back on their teacher in order to help teacher perform better in class. No one wants to study in a class which is difficult to understand. Hence, studying in a class which enables students feel comfortable it will bring some good result for students.
In conclusion, evaluation teachers bring many advantages for both teachers and students. As a result, this positive trend should be promoted in the future.
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway to reduce traffic congesstion. Others think that building more and wider road is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Disscuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The chat below give information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2016, and future projection of 2025. 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 78
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views 72
Comments
Essay evaluation report
to chose teachers who they admire.
to chose teachers whom they admire.
evaluation teachers bring many advantage
evaluating teachers brings many advantages
the evaluation of teachers brings many advantages
flaws:
No. of Words: 311 while No. of Different Words: 151 //Need more unique words. Read more essays by top users and follow their writing skills:
http://www.testbig.com/users/sfaht1
http://www.testbig.com/users/mrmo2610
http://www.testbig.com/users/nader
http://www.testbig.com/users/subodh860
http://www.testbig.com/users/azizkhan
http://www.testbig.com/users/newuser
http://www.testbig.com/users/misterwandering
http://www.testbig.com/users/elaine-10
http://www.testbig.com/users/habiba
http://www.testbig.com/users/mandy192q
http://www.testbig.com/users/grt2bagal
http://www.testbig.com/users/nikita
http://testbig.com/users/pip-depp
http://testbig.com/users/lynmelissa
http://testbig.com/users/justin
http://testbig.com/users/shi24
http://testbig.com/users/shokh
http://www.testbig.com/users/hao
http://www.testbig.com/users/laurieannbantiling
http://www.testbig.com/users/dmelen
http://www.testbig.com/users/sunuwar42
http://www.testbig.com/users/kenoky
http://www.testbig.com/users/sara83
http://www.testbig.com/users/xthangbm
and more:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/ielts
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 311 350
No. of Characters: 1615 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.199 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.193 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.639 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.368 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.507 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.373 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.373 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nge the teaching methods to satisfy the students requirement. For example, instead of us...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276470588235 0.247107183377 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.191176470588 0.155533422707 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0588235294118 0.0946595960268 62% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0352941176471 0.0501214627716 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0441176470588 0.0437548338989 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117647058824 0.122226691241 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0470588235294 0.0403226058552 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72273419569 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0411764705882 0.0326793684256 126% => OK
Particles: 0.00294117647059 0.00163938923432 179% => OK
Determiners: 0.0705882352941 0.0861772015684 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0264705882353 0.021408717616 124% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0235294117647 0.011925033212 197% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1957.0 1933.35771543 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 316.048096192 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29260450161 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405144694534 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.35691318328 0.28420135186 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.257234726688 0.203846283523 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11575562701 0.137316102897 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72273419569 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.037074148 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485530546624 0.56093040696 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.4112980186 60.7387585426 80% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.3684210526 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5020775063 49.517814964 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 127.492653851 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.842105263158 0.814263465372 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 52.0597393806 49.1944974215 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.63043478261 1.69124875643 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322619967807 0.332605444948 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134263444831 0.102741220458 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0629978406322 0.0668466124924 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.504217573326 0.534860350844 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.100878954063 0.148594505496 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132832249102 0.134430193775 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743280438753 0.0742795772207 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.366267470357 0.324371583561 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.106445638031 0.0638462369009 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224164481113 0.228012699653 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722381347801 0.058150111329 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.68436873747 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 5.90881763527 237% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.4468937876 163% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.