Many schools ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you think it is a good idea? Give reasons and details to support your idea.

In the modern world, there is a trend in almost all the schools to judge teachers, which is usually done by the students. But is this this kind of judging is positive for the children and the society at large? Many people think that it is not as important as this has no effect on the education. However, I strongly believe that the benefits of assessment far outweigh any negative repercussions.

To embark upon, it can chisel the teaching skills of a person and thus help him in becoming a better teacher. It is no exaggeration to state that most of the times many people have ample knowledge but do not have the talent to present it correctly. I can reminisce that one of my English teachers used to speak very fast. In spite, of having excellent command over the subject, he was not able to deliver it properly. Thus, students did not like him and soon he was replaced with another teacher. Therefore, it is extremely essential to take feedback from the students, so, that one can make the required changes to satisfy students.

Moreover, students can avail this opportunity to tell their difficulties and to solve them. All children are different, they have sundry level of intelligence thus some students take more time to comprehend a particular topic. For example when I was in my tenth class, it was quite intricate for me to solve Maths problems and when I told this to my teacher during evaluation, he understood my problem. Hence, he paid more attention towards me which improved my performance. Although, there are many more examples but this one explicitly proves my point.

To recapitulate, it is always better to let a person know about his flaws and provide him a chance of correcting himself. I firmly believe that no one is perfect in this world, every person has some or the other issue. So if we will keep on rejecting people hoping that we will get a best teacher some day then I do not think it is realistic. In stead, we should encourage this procedure because it not only assist in improvisation but indeed strengthen the bonding between the teachers and the students which is must.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...is usually done by the students. But is this this kind of judging is positive for the chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ery person has some or the other issue. So if we will keep on rejecting people hoping...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ejecting people hoping that we will get a best teacher some day then I do not thi...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69086021505 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66783029373 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6792900271 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8421052632 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757445495114 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024542304255 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029495669491 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469416473154 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138069173451 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Some persons regard kicking untamed animals or birds out of the city as true, whereas, others believe in opposite attitude towards these creatures. It is clear that keeping them in the city is not a viable idea. Firstly, this essay will discuss the importance of taking wild animals and birds back to their wildlife habitat and secondly, the essay will look at the effects of keeping them in the city.

There is a growing body of evidence that emphasizes the significance of virgin territories for savage animals and birds. As most of environmentalists always alert community about vulnerabilities of wildlife, we are supposed to respect them and do not keep these creatures apart from where they are belong to. The New York Times reported in march 2016 that 32% of animals that have lost their habitats because of human's ambitions to develop roads and bridges, and come toward cities between 2013 to 2015, passed away, whereas 20% of the rest injured severely.

Some people like to keep wild creatures in the city and think being under full-watch supervision of municipality’s agents, they are safe and secure, whereas, not only taking care of them is hardly possible but also their instinctive behaviours might be dangerous, even fatal for citizens. For example, recently, Ali Mikaeli the reporter of VIP, announce that a family who keep some untamed snakes in their house, found the youngest child unconscious and poisoned at the doorway.

In conclusion, it is much more better to force beast animals and birds return to their habitat because staying in the city not only is a bad option for them but also may endanger people.