The treading and the the speaker discussing about the European explorer brought the silver coins to the north america but in contrasts ways.
Firstly, reading suggests that Norse people did not travel such long distance from the Europe to Canada through Atlantic ocean because there no evidence for that. But, lecture refutes this point by saying that Norse not only brought silver but also other valuable things along with them. Further, they were much interested in travelling for long distances.
Secondly, reading claims that in north america they did not any more silver coin because archaeologist would not more coins other regions, so, the Norse are not earlier settler and they did not make any trade with native american. Again, the speaker refuses this point by stating that Norse not a permanent settler that is the reason they might be taken the all silver coins while returning to the Europe.
Thirdly, reading argues that silver coins are useless for the native america and further they did not recognised as money. So, Norse are not earlier explorer according to reading passage. Still, the professor opposes this point by explaining that native american might be attracted to the silver and they made silver in ornament like necklace and so on.
To sum up, reading passage says that Europeans are not earlier explorer because there was only one silver coin found at site, they not capable to travel distance and native american never valued the silver as money but the professor refutes all these point with reasonable evidences.
- Task1: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage.Reading: As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the Americ 60
- some people prefer to eat at food stands and resturants. Other people prefer to prepare andeat food at home. Which do you prefer? use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- You have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter explain why you have moved describe the new house invite your friend to come and visit 70
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you A/D? extended families are not important these days as they were in the past.Give specific reasons to support. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
The treading and the the speaker discussing about the European e...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
The treading and the the speaker discussing about the European e...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'recognise'
Suggestion: recognise
...native america and further they did not recognised as money. So, Norse are not earlier ex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not recognised as money. So, Norse are not earlier explorer according to readin...
^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ight be attracted to the silver and they made silver in ornament like necklace an...
^^
Line 11, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these point with reasonable evidences.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while', 'in contrast', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220216606498 0.261695866417 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.162454873646 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.086642599278 0.0723426182421 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.108303249097 0.0435111971325 249% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.028880866426 0.0277247811725 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115523465704 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.057761732852 0.0370669169778 156% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.21176470588 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252707581227 0.0208969081088 121% => OK
Particles: 0.00361010830325 0.00154638098197 233% => OK
Determiners: 0.101083032491 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0108303249097 0.0158828679856 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0072202166065 0.0114777025283 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1564.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 255.0 271.125827815 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13333333333 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38431372549 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278431372549 0.287516216867 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.152941176471 0.187439937562 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0745098039216 0.113142543107 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21176470588 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 49.3511268329 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 25.5 21.7502111507 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6350524097 49.3711431718 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.4 132.220823453 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 21.7502111507 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 0.878197800319 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 53.3431372549 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.31325301205 1.90840788429 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.614208432097 0.549887131256 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113925903032 0.142949733639 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0685619207638 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.67422142683 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.212072640177 0.139662658121 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283891335573 0.266732575781 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143366589612 0.103435571967 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.34405311014 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.142976568243 0.0530846634433 269% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41275233555 0.40443939384 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949425740351 0.0528353158467 180% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.