Given is that, the bar chart illustrates the marks of 3 teams including a, b and c in four consecutive years from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, the first impression of the graph is that team b has won the highest number of points in all four years. Graph also gives the view that team a and c did not get much improvement in their points.
Looking at detail, it is shown that team b had a peak attempt in their marks in 2002. After that a steady fall occured till 2004, then climbed to 55 points in 2005. Interestingly, lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 2005. There is a remarkable improvement was for team a till 2004. But when it reached to 2005, score plummet to 6. Least number of mark was received by team c.
In conclusion, team a and c need to get more improvements to reach near team b.
- government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money. government must invest this money in public services instead. to what extend do you agree with this statement? 68
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999. 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information 56
- Nowadays the number of cars on road is increasing incrementally In order to change this trends strict road tolls should be paid on busy roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Essay evaluation report
Given is that, the bar chart illustrates the marks of 3 teams
Given is the bar chart which illustrates the marks of 3 teams
lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 2005.
the lowest points of 5 which was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 2005.
There is a remarkable improvement was for team a
Description: two verbs in one sentence. can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: After that a steady fall occured till 2004, then climbed to 55 points in 2005.
Error: occured Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 643 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 3.921 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.402 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 28 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 19 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 11 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.004 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.428 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.634 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...ustrates the marks of 3 teams including a, b and c in four consecutive years from ...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...mbed to 55 points in 2005. Interestingly, lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gly, lowest points of 5 was got by team a in 2002 was taken over by team c in 200...
^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...it reached to 2005, score plummet to 6. Least number of mark was received by team c. ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'as for', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254143646409 0.268076937826 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.160220994475 0.116061578633 138% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0662983425414 0.0759168565197 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0165745856354 0.0366838410393 45% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0220994475138 0.0131127313244 169% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132596685083 0.155750635184 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0441988950276 0.0379272487307 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45303142595 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0331491712707 0.0210936926555 157% => OK
Particles: 0.00552486187845 0.00175180941692 315% => OK
Determiners: 0.0883977900552 0.0948980150116 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0110497237569 0.00967000014798 114% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 833.0 1161.00487805 72% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.9 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07926829268 5.90752243213 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.176829268293 0.337110787985 52% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.128048780488 0.247514529752 52% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0731707317073 0.171178102325 43% => More words length more than 7 chars wanted.
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0609756097561 0.112407865282 54% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45303142595 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.546246751206 107% => OK
Word variations: 51.0747350993 49.3433353143 104% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2222222222 23.0094962315 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1661358757 42.9750493124 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 135.714022679 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 23.0094962315 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.689975730869 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 31.027100271 47.7609492067 65% => OK
Elegance: 2.16666666667 2.94281807926 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163776251599 0.418131533498 39% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.161281883203 0.181151798455 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10957844812 0.0850326197045 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.616117062 0.706616315825 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.244448709287 0.157042692854 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792975032884 0.228904883108 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903663025549 0.108899403657 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.275223851844 0.367819155151 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0354498707902 0.0812612215331 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13716945138 0.316326947829 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953351854795 0.0921553760075 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 4.0 7.1512195122 56% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.