The article states that the portrait of a teenage girl which is professionally painted was a Jane Austen's portrait however, professor refutes all the claims made by the author. Professor casts doubt on the believability of painting that, the subject of a painting was really a Jane Austen.
Firstly, Jane Austen's family claimed that the portrait was of Jane Austen after many years when she was dead.Professor questioned this hypothesis by saying that it was impossible to believe on her extended family members who hardly saw her when she was younger.
Secondly, passage states that the face in the portrait more a like her sister-cassandra sketch which shows adult Austen. The resemblance in the face features shows that the portrait was a younger Jane Austen. Although, professor asserts that Jane Austen's family was large and it may be possible that the young girl may be her relative. It may happened that the young girl's portrait may be her extended family member's portrait, may be her distant niece.
Lastly, an author mentioned the evidence of society portrait painter- Ozias Humphrey. Though it was said that the painting was done by Humphrey at the same age when Jane Austen was a younger girl but, professor disprove this prediction. The stamp at the back of the painting shows that the Humphrey did not sell his painting early in the England when Jane Austen was a younger girl however, she was elder when the actually painting was sold by Humphrey.
In conclusion, professor questioned all the claims made by the author by giving reasonable proofs.
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo 83
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Professor
...sten after many years when she was dead.Professor questioned this hypothesis by saying th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: MORE_A_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a more like'?
Suggestion: a more like
...ge states that the face in the portrait more a like her sister-cassandra sketch which shows...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
... it may be possible that the young girl may be her relative. It may happened that the ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'girls'' or 'girl's'?
Suggestion: girls'; girl's
...elative. It may happened that the young girls portrait may be her extended family mem...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
... happened that the young girls portrait may be her extended family members portrait, m...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...e her extended family members portrait, may be her distant niece. Lastly, an author...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'lastly', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276595744681 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.173758865248 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0602836879433 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0496453900709 0.0435111971325 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0496453900709 0.0277247811725 179% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124113475177 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0354609929078 0.0370669169778 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65929641638 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00354609929078 0.0208969081088 17% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.127659574468 0.128158765124 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0177304964539 0.0158828679856 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0283687943262 0.0114777025283 247% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1569.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 261.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01149425287 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375478927203 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.298850574713 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199233716475 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0919540229885 0.113142543107 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65929641638 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455938697318 0.539623497131 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.1455624436 53.8517498576 78% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.7272727273 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3960719142 49.3711431718 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.636363636 132.220823453 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.878197800319 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 53.6123301985 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.5974025974 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.696865356852 0.549887131256 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.226964201719 0.142949733639 159% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.165470524745 0.0787303798458 210% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.741780099142 0.631733273073 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.181295863569 0.139662658121 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.382293150638 0.266732575781 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139995142267 0.103435571967 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.310181135424 0.414875509568 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.036639226494 0.0530846634433 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.454890852657 0.40443939384 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142374189736 0.0528353158467 269% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.