The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large.
Desires, especially the ones pertaining to monetary benefits are frowned upon in general while disregarding the fact that money runs our everyday life, economies in general. Everyone wants to move up the ladder when it comes the financial well-being but if someone succeeds we look at them with disdain. Money has become the forbidden fruit of the present world.
I believe the desire to maximize profit is a universal one. People, organization (even religious and spiritual institutions) desire money not just for the sake vanity but also for the sake of achieving higher goals at a scale wherever everyone including them benefits. There is no wrong if corporations are voraciously fighting to satiate these desires as long as they are within the legal boundaries of the nation.
To think that when corporations flourish and earn, it is at the cost of welfare of the general public is a flawed argument. Corporations are not an isolated phenomenon. They give employment to the people of the same society. When they make profit, they are legally bound to share that profit with the nation in terms of taxes. The strength of corporations determines the robustness of a nations economy. The employees too get their fair share of the profit in some corporation.
All corporations across the world indulge in some form of philanthropic endeavors. Facebook's CEO has promised to share huge chunk of the profit with the society in some form of social work over the years. The Bill and Milanda Gates foundation has indulged in social reforms across the world especially the under-developed and developing countries. Warren Buffet has donated almost everything he has earned. And they are doing all this while they are changing the map of technologies used by us.
As long as the corporations are adhering to legal formalities and environmental laws in the fullest of form they are not in conflict with the nation and the welfare of people. They in fact augment a nation's economy, help in eradication unemployment, improve living standards and also lets the people of the country share the fruits of its fortunes.
- Compare and contrast the way of your life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying for the next generations? 78
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized. 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 16
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rn, it is at the cost of welfare of the general public is a flawed argument. Corporations are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...orations determines the robustness of a nations economy. The employees too get their f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to get'?
Suggestion: to get
...ss of a nations economy. The employees too get their fair share of the profit in some ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...lfare of people. They in fact augment a nations economy, help in eradication unemployme...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28 0.240241500013 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.144 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0693333333333 0.0880659088768 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0453333333333 0.0497285424764 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0506666666667 0.0444667217837 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141333333333 0.12292977631 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0453333333333 0.0406280797675 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85410696231 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.024 0.030933414821 78% => OK
Particles: 0.00266666666667 0.0016655270985 160% => OK
Determiners: 0.128 0.0997080785238 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0249443105267 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0106666666667 0.0148568991511 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2113.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 349.0 452.878318584 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05444126074 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358166189112 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275071633238 0.280924506359 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19770773639 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131805157593 0.132149295362 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85410696231 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553008595989 0.48968727796 113% => OK
Word variations: 60.7517616844 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3684210526 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0036355964 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.210526316 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 45.8755843764 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.94444444444 1.64882698954 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.579826240657 0.391690518653 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102041353312 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.076194199397 0.077325440228 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.56612731825 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157202242594 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246354448091 0.161403998019 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111814169748 0.0892212321368 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.434454683786 0.385218514788 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0751832065424 0.0692045440612 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.406573990562 0.275328986314 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669580560036 0.0653680567796 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.