Both the article and the lecture discusses about the paintings of famous Dutch painter Rembrandt. This discussion focuses on some doubtful paintings, attributed to him specially the one named "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in White Bonnet". The author presents different doubtful aspects of the painting however the professor counters them with detailed analysis and example.
First the writer doubts about the details of the painting, for which Rembrandt was well known for, specially the contrast of a cheap white linen cap with the luxurious fur collar. On the other hand the professor states that the fur collar has been added about 100 years after the original painting was made, mainly to increase the value of the painting by presenting a aristocrat woman in it. In the actual painting there was a light colour cloth instead of a pricy fur collar which completely fullfils the details normally seen in Rembrandt paintings.
Secondly this also clarifies the confusion around the painter's maestry of light and shadow. As the author says the light coming from below illuminating the lady's face should not as such due to the dark coloured fur collar. AS the professor says instead of the dark collar, a light coloured cloth which was actually in the real painting can make this face illumination possible.
Finally, Rembrandt is known for making his painting on a single piece of wood which was not the case in this particular one. The writer supports this with the evidence of glue lines at the back of the painting. However the professor clarifies this was done when the fur collar was added to the original painting to make the painting more grand looking and hence valuable. Moreover the Rembrandt has painted his "Self portrait in Hat" on a piece of wood from the same tree which has been originally used in this painting.
So this is clearly observed here that the professors refutes all the claims made by the article hence proves the painting was originally made by Rembrandt.
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
- Independent writing (question 2)Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your cho 70
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 86
- 72) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades (marks) encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the value of the painting by presenting a aristocrat woman in it. In the actual p...
^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...glue lines at the back of the painting. However the professor clarifies this was done w...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... more grand looking and hence valuable. Moreover the Rembrandt has painted his 'Sel...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265027322404 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.144808743169 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0819672131148 0.0723426182421 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0601092896175 0.0435111971325 138% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0136612021858 0.0277247811725 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133879781421 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0601092896175 0.0370669169778 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57172383645 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0136612021858 0.0208969081088 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.169398907104 0.128158765124 132% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00546448087432 0.0158828679856 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016393442623 0.0114777025283 143% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2014.0 1645.83664459 122% => OK
No of words: 334.0 271.125827815 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02994011976 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347305389222 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287425149701 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.221556886228 0.187439937562 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122754491018 0.113142543107 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57172383645 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.8556444871 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8571428571 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7415900331 49.3711431718 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.857142857 132.220823453 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07142857143 0.878197800319 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 52.5996578272 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.1 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.690152952377 0.549887131256 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.148726258688 0.142949733639 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0858962902432 0.0787303798458 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.715039352016 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.110417941736 0.139662658121 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.368532630778 0.266732575781 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708737722381 0.103435571967 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.493889616779 0.414875509568 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0534891518023 0.0530846634433 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.496935789167 0.40443939384 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789755581798 0.0528353158467 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.