Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is benificial for tham. why?
What are the possible solutions to envourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport?
In the recent years, the modern society has recognized the significance of bicycle riding as a transportation on a regular basis, affecting human lives with healthy and well-being lifespans. However, some countries are commonly not used to ride bikes. In this essay, I will pose the reason why using bicycle is not popular as well as the ways to solve this phenomenon with some applicable supports.
To begin with, there are several factors that bicycles are not popular transports in some countries. As the first, even though bicycles are definitely environmental-friendly, the other modes of transportation such as cars, buses, trains, and flights are far faster and more convenient. To be specific, the latter vehicles are operated without many physical efforts, as it utilizes fossil fuels or gases and automatically runs. Moreover, as people's life styles have altered to be more hactic and busy, they do not try to spend long time to commute by using bicycles. Another reason is that there are not proper bicycle roads on the countsruction level. Thus, it is difficult to ride a bike on the common occassions.
In terms of the solutions of this trend, I suggest important methods to encourage the public to drive bicycles. from the individual points of view, the perception about bicycles has to change. It means that nowadays people consider their healthy lives, so they have opportunities to intensify and to regularly exercise by commuting by this fit vehicle. Furthermore, on the governmental level, for citizens' safty, some detailed bicycle laws should be established as well as governments supports the bicycle rad builds. As a result, by implementing the safe bicycle environment, peopel will be interested in the bicycles and use them.
To recapitulate, as I mentioned both the reasons of unfamiliar bikes and how to solve it, on the personal and government level, many efforts are needed to encourage peopel to ride it due to diverse benifits of using bicycles.
- Shopping is dangerous because it makes people selfish and careless with money. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? 78
- The bar graph shows net national income (that's the income earned by the various factors of production in the economy, after the loss of used-up capital equipment has been accounted for) in per capita terms. 56
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the recent years, the modern society ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nomenon with some applicable supports. To begin with, there are several factors...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ride a bike on the common occassions. In terms of the solutions of this trend,...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...encourage the public to drive bicycles. from the individual points of view, the perc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terested in the bicycles and use them. To recapitulate, as I mentioned both the...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'such as', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223140495868 0.247107183377 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.159779614325 0.155533422707 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104683195592 0.0946595960268 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0606060606061 0.0501214627716 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0330578512397 0.0437548338989 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115702479339 0.122226691241 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0358126721763 0.0403226058552 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.05019065849 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0495867768595 0.0326793684256 152% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0936639118457 0.0861772015684 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00826446280992 0.021408717616 39% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00550964187328 0.011925033212 46% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1983.0 1933.35771543 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 316.048096192 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15838509317 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.394409937888 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295031055901 0.28420135186 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204968944099 0.203846283523 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.137316102897 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05019065849 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.037074148 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.56093040696 104% => OK
Word variations: 64.8121671197 60.7387585426 107% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4666666667 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4421284889 49.517814964 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.2 127.492653851 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.866666666667 0.814263465372 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 50.9697722567 49.1944974215 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.47826086957 1.69124875643 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509751606697 0.332605444948 153% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10037138148 0.102741220458 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.065658451141 0.0668466124924 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.525475771841 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.16759034773 0.148594505496 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202952055019 0.134430193775 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540195110222 0.0742795772207 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.392723091967 0.324371583561 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00544748274272 0.0638462369009 9% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353165845849 0.228012699653 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524329972363 0.058150111329 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.