The bar chart illustrates the consumption of Coca-Cola in six regions in the year of 2000. The line graph depicts the price of Coca-Cola share from 1996 to 2001.
Overall, North America consumed the most Coca-Cola of a total of 17.1 billion bottles in 2000. Coca-Cola share price peaked in the year of 1998.
North America was the major market of Coca-Cola, which consumed 30.4% of the sale of 2000. The second and third large market were Latin America and Europe, which constituted 25.7% and 20.5% of the annual sale of 2000 respectively. By contrast, the sale in Asia, Africa and Middle East were mediocre, which merely comprised 15.4% and 7.0% of the entire sale of 2000 respectively.
The share price of Coca-Cola varied over the span of the five years. Share price of Coca-Cola raised from over 30 dollars in 1990 to almost 70 dollars in 1997. Afterward, it declined a little at the end of 1997 before reaching its peak of almost 80 dollars in 1998. Thereafter, its price drastically decreased to below 50 dollars in 2000. The share price slightly increased to over 50 dollars in 2001.
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 56
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below You should write at least 150 words You should spend abou 75
- In some countries there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home Instead of sending them to school Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 96
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobilephone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant . 67
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48762031822 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.547539520022 92% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2292204797 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8333333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160766660577 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073473517169 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363022301074 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10570471715 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277802938143 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.