The line graph illustrates acid level in mouth from the moment eating sugar or honey to 40 minutes elapsed after consuming it. Acid level below 5.5 in pH level are likely to decay teeth.
Overall, cane sugar decays teeth for the longest time; whereas, honey decays teeth for the shortest time. Fruit sugar is moderate.
The moment after eating acid level of mouth begins to decline. The acid level of mouth decreases to the bottom in five minutes. Cane sugar causes the lowest acid level in mouth of 3.5 pH level; honey and fruit sugar cause the acid level in mouth to nearly 5 and over 4 in pH level respectively.
Thereafter, the acid level of honey remains a pleatou of approximately 5 in pH level for five minutes. The acid level caused by honey increases to the stage that unlike to cause tooth decay in 15 minutes after consuming honey. However, the acid level caused by cane sugar increases slowly and it grows to the acid level that unlikely to decay tooth in 30 minutes after eating cane sugar. On the other hand, fruit sugar decays tooth for about 15 minutes after eating it.
- The table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 67
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million 80
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. summaries the information by selecting and the reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16046601737 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430769230769 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2941294795 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8181818182 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371557211243 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190347077491 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997290100876 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257063075984 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128189912397 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.