History is a record of the past, that provides us with stories worth thinking. Local history is a brief introduction to the past and world history opens s wider window. Some people insist local history is more important than world history, thus school students should learn more about local history. Personally, I do not agree with this approach. I believe both local history and world history are important and worth learning.
Local history scopes into hte past of native country, that provides school students with a better understanding of their country. By learning local history, school students acquire the knowledge of how the country eloved from the past to what it is now. In the mean time, they study the transition of tradition and culture. However, the nurish of perspective will be flawed if they only learn local history, because the history of a country not only shape under the domestic force but also change under the influence of the outer world.
The advantages of learning world history can be expressed into two aspects. The first aspect is world history enable a border perspective for students. They will learn that there are other regimes other than their own country. The second aspect is world history is the key answer to some impretive changes in local history. For instance, the open-up of China in 1900s was the result of the industry revolution of the world. Therefore, learning world history is equil important.
Form my point of view, I believe it is better to learn local history in primary school and learn world history in secondary school. Because it is theoryly practical to generate a better undetstanding of both local history and world history. Students learn local history at primary school equip with the knowledge of the past and questions of how the event happened. They will find their answers in theri secondary school when they study world history.
To summarize, local history is important, so is world history. Learning local history provides a brief understanding of the past, and learning world history offer a bordet view of the history. I believe it is better to learn local history first and the world history.
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. summaries the information by selecting and the reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 93
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is to address it at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with 82
- The diagram below shows stages and equipment used in cement-making process and how cement is used to produce for concrete production. 56
- Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work.How do you think children should spend their free time ? 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der the influence of the outer world. The advantages of learning world history...
^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1900s'.
Suggestion: in the 1900s
...ory. For instance, the open-up of China in 1900s was the result of the industry revoluti...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.286432160804 0.247107183377 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.128140703518 0.155533422707 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.125628140704 0.0946595960268 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0376884422111 0.0501214627716 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0452261306533 0.0437548338989 103% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110552763819 0.122226691241 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0175879396985 0.0403226058552 44% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.48796897525 2.80594681477 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0175879396985 0.0326793684256 54% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0979899497487 0.0861772015684 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125628140704 0.021408717616 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150753768844 0.011925033212 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2179.0 1933.35771543 113% => OK
No of words: 362.0 316.048096192 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01933701657 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361878453039 0.374742101984 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279005524862 0.28420135186 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17679558011 0.203846283523 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0883977900552 0.137316102897 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48796897525 2.80594681477 89% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.037074148 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425414364641 0.56093040696 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.492194418 60.7387585426 72% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0891783567 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.4545454545 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9212004898 49.517814964 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0454545455 127.492653851 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.454545454545 0.814263465372 56% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 44.3550979407 49.1944974215 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.96428571429 1.69124875643 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320442154867 0.332605444948 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112561581205 0.102741220458 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0865704970642 0.0668466124924 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.574764755751 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166921656501 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165393948163 0.134430193775 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111152558264 0.0742795772207 150% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.494801649448 0.324371583561 153% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0877916231005 0.0638462369009 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265952697694 0.228012699653 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104203162825 0.058150111329 179% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.41683366733 322% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 1.9629258517 357% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.