do you agree or disagree?teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn.

Essay topics:

do you agree or disagree?teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn.

The question is whether teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn or not. Everyone with regard to cons and pros of this issue and also his private viewpoint can maintain a specific direction toward this idea; however I am willing to affirm that it can have horrible and destructive effects on student's education, the methods of teaching and social behavior in the class and list goes on. My arguments are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:

To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that the teachers play a crucial role in society. Besides teaching or taking exam, their role in social aspects of students' life is undeniable. If we postulate that they will be paid base on students’ score, the circumstance of classes will be changed. For instance, talking about students' favorites, telling joke and creating a joyful condition for students will be unimportant and even worse the teacher may become to apathetic people who looking for more much money. It goes without saying that the ambient of classes will become to a rigid room; consequently students will be frustrated from attending in it.

The second reason that I refute this idea lies in the fact that the teachers for receiving more fund, will ignore some activities in the classes. For example, some teachers divide their class to 2 groups and students will be able to participate in teamwork. Spontaneously sharing ability of experiences improves in students’ mental and subsequently students' performance will be raised. As we all know, teamwork usually does not affect on students’ grades; hence it will be removed gradually from education system. It is naturally that when money interferes in anything, people will prefer their own profit.

I am going to empower my reasons by following discussion. There are some students who have trouble in learning, so in an ordinary class the teacher spends more time with them. When money enters in story, the teachers will be inclined toward students who learn faster. In fact a bias behavior will be revealed.
By taking all above mentioned arguments, this conclusion could be drawn that it is a useless idea and can create a lot of problems in a class. It will be better to teachers are judged base on other things not students' mark.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-10 Bobby1987 76 view
2019-09-07 tjehdaud12 76 view
2019-07-30 S_Daftari 76 view
2019-02-15 mehrnazsadr 73 view
2018-11-29 valerii 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ave horrible and destructive effects on students education, the methods of teaching and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alking about students favorites, telling joke and creating a joyful condition for...
^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... we all know, teamwork usually does not affect on students' grades; hence it will be...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, for example, for instance, in fact, talking about, to begin with, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01818181818 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70386241979 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550649350649 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0272828917 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272347491653 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110076470444 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127786077931 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167301626561 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392315525819 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

and list goes on.
and the list goes on.

will be paid base on students’ score,
will be paid based on students’ score,

apathetic people who looking for more much money
apathetic people who are looking for more money

It will be better to teachers are judged base on other things not students' mark.
It will be better to teachers who are judged based on other things not students' mark.

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 385 350
No. of Characters: 1862 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.43 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.836 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.546 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.263 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.994 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.479 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5