Teachers should encourage theirs students to question everything.
Nowadays students have access to many sources to study outside school. They can deepen on internet what they are going to study and be more prepared for classes, for example. However, I do not agree that teachers should encourage students to question everything they see or that they are going to study.
Firstly, the amount of subjects and sources available on internet is immense. As internet is world widely accessible, it is easy to someone upload or post something personal about any subject. One text posted in favor of a specific issue, a war for example, is just a personal opinion. Students do not need try to change the writer’s point of view if they disagree.
Secondly, questioning everything can be a waste of time for students. Instead of spending time researching on things that matters, they will be discussing on subjects that are not related to their field of study. They will not deepen on their own subject and later may have trouble finishing it. For example, when in college I had a friend who had to deliver a research about thermodynamic in a specific date. This friend was not focused on this work and kept working with another professor, about another subject. He asked everything to this professor and learned a lot, but it was not related to thermodynamic. When the delivery date arrived, he asked the professor for more time, but when the professor found out that he was working on another project on things that did not matter, he did not accept and graded the student with a zero. Had he focused on the first one he would have finished it on time.
For these reasons, I believe that teachers should not encourage students to question everything. The amount of information available is immense and they can lose focus if question everything. Also, they can waste precious time that can affect their grades if not properly used.
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 80
- Teachers should encourage theirs students to question everything. 60
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uploads'.
Suggestion: uploads
...idely accessible, it is easy to someone upload or post something personal about any su...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...fic issue, a war for example, is just a personal opinion. Students do not need try to change the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to try'?
Suggestion: to try
... personal opinion. Students do not need try to change the writer's point of vi...
^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...llege I had a friend who had to deliver a research about thermodynamic in a specific date....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83800623053 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61700043898 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.524837075471 94% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8949083359 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2777777778 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22267588676 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790987334861 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141135655693 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167945556726 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145364575399 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.