The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to type of working schedules and provides few reasons of support. However, the professor explain that it has some negative effect and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First the reading stated that individuals should be given option either 4 days or 5 days in a week which is compulsory and lead to increase the profit and moreover, workers effiency are increased owing to less error they will tend to do after having rest. In contrary, the professor provides the information offering 4 days job will induce to decrease the profit due to new employee's needs such as training,medical insurance as well as office space and computer. Clearly, a disparity exist between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that hiring new worker for 4 days shifts contains disadvantages.
Second, the reading pushes forth the idea that unemployment ratio will be diminished due to working hours of full time employee is lessened which cause to hire new worker. Nevertheless, the professor contends that by explaining it is risky because instead of hiring new employee, the employers would ask their workers in order for overtime as well as raising their expectation therefore, no additional job will be required.
Finally, the reading posits that with 4 day option,the workers would gain more free time that improve their qualities of life, for instance; spending extra time with families, private interest so on and so forth. The professor refutes that point by explaining that indeed this option may reduce the quality of life and and job ability. Moreover, they lose their chance to advance their career and also with any economical down can give rise to lose their job.
In summary, while both the reading and lecture provide interesting information with regard to types of working schedules, a significant amount of evidence support that grounds which are provided by the professor much more legitimate. Therefore, the reading fails to justify the claim towards the professor.
- What change would make your hometown more appealing to people your age. 80
- The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to type of working schedules and provides few reasons of support. However, the professor explain that it has some negative effect and opposes each of the author's reasons. 3
- It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- permanent human being on the venus 81
- A foreign visitor has only one day to spend in your country. Where should this visitor go on that day? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , medical
... to new employees needs such as training,medical insurance as well as office space and c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...l be diminished due to working hours of full time employee is lessened which cause to hir...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...he reading posits that with 4 day option,the workers would gain more free time that ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 316, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...s option may reduce the quality of life and and job ability. Moreover, they lose their ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15562913907 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74488931473 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8355835368 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.545454545 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06452816374 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871151152724 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397044034388 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421079703474 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619944370548 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453722551265 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.