The articles state that salvage logging is beneficial for both to damaged forest and economy and provides three reasons of support. The professor, however, explains that however it may be seen beneficial on short term but it is harmful in long term and it's economical benefit is questionable. The author refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading claims that removable of dead trees will provide space for growth of new plants. The author refutes this point by that decaying of dead trees will enriches the soil and helps in growth of future generation . He states that removal of dead trees will strip the nutrition in forest soil, hindering in growth of new plant.
Second, the article posits that dead trees will provide shelter for harmful insects, making new plants vulnerable to attack by these insects. However, the professor says that for 100 years, these insects are leaving in the forest without causing any harm. According to professor, the dead trees will provide habitat for many beneficial plants and insects, which facilitate growth of new plants.
Third, the reading says that salvage logging will provide economic benefit for both wood industry and local people. The professor opposes this point by saying explaining that large vehicle and helicopter are used to remove this woods;thus, make expensive to remove these woods. We also learned that instead of local people, it requires outside skilled people to carry out this job and it is a temporary job.
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 85
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...its economical benefit is questionable. The author refutes each of the authors reas...
^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'enrich'
Suggestion: enrich
...int by that decaying of dead trees will enriches the soil and helps in growth of future ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and helps in growth of future generation . He states that removal of dead trees wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11885245902 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37281563987 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549180327869 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2702921065 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.083333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348965579523 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133086836082 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793758631624 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199490107914 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295565979475 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.